Clicky

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony RX10 III

Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front
Portability
53
Imaging
52
Features
77
Overall
62

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs

Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Launched February 2014
Sony RX10 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
  • Revealed March 2016
  • Older Model is Sony RX10 II
  • New Model is Sony RX10 IV
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony RX10 III Overview

On this page, we are analyzing the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony RX10 III, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Sigma and Sony. The sensor resolution of the DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the RX10 III (20MP) is fairly comparable but the DP2 Quattro (APS-C) and RX10 III (1") offer totally different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The DP2 Quattro was released 3 years before the RX10 III and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the DP2 Quattro scores against the RX10 III when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Sony RX10 III

 DP2 Quattro RX10 III 

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 RX10 III DP2 Quattro 
RevealedMarch 2016February 2014Fresher by 25 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1229k920kSharper display (+309k dot)

Common features in the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony RX10 III

 DP2 Quattro RX10 III 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Sigma DP2 Quattro has got physical dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Sony RX10 III has sizing of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") accompanied by a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).

Take a look at the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony RX10 III in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the DP2 Quattro and the RX10 III.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony RX10 III size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the DP2 Quattro and RX10 III is 70 and 53 respectively.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing just by going through specifications. The visual here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the DP2 Quattro and RX10 III.

To sum up, both of these cameras have the same megapixel count but not the same sensor sizing. The DP2 Quattro has the larger sensor which is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler. The older DP2 Quattro will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography details
Sony RX10 III Portrait photography details
77
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
offers face detection focus
exports RAW formats
71
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (1")
supports face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Street photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Street photography camera
61
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
64
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good sensor size (1")
supports RAW formats
environment proof
heavier than others in class (1,051 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography highlights
Sony RX10 III Sports photography highlights
48
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
lacks phase detect auto focus
70
incredible zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
silent shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
good sensor size (1")
supports tracking focus
environment proof
good battery pack (420 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography details
Sony RX10 III Travel photography details
53
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
55
good battery pack (420 CIPA)
environment proof
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
long reach (600mm)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than others in class (1,051g)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.4)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Landscape photography camera
59
manual focus
screen size is decent (3 inch)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
63
you can focus manually
really wide (24mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (1")
supports RAW formats
environment proof
good battery pack (420 CIPA)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.4)
missing Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging highlights
Sony RX10 III Vlogging highlights
9
no video shooting
28
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focusing
video res high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
includes mic port
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.4)
screen is not selfie friendly
heavier than others in class (1,051g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony RX10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony RX10 III
 Sigma DP2 QuattroSony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
General Information
Make Sigma Sony
Model type Sigma DP2 Quattro Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
Category Large Sensor Compact Large Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2014-02-13 2016-03-29
Body design Large Sensor Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor TRUE III engine Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1"
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.7mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 369.0mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5424 x 3616 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 6400 12800
Maximum enhanced ISO - 25600
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW photos
Min enhanced ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 45mm (1x) 24-600mm (25.0x)
Maximal aperture f/2.8 f/2.4-4.0
Macro focusing range - 3cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 2.7
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 920 thousand dot 1,229 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Min shutter speed 30 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Max silent shutter speed - 1/32000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 14.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options no built-in flash Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Maximum video resolution None 3840x2160
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 395 grams (0.87 lbs) 1051 grams (2.32 lbs)
Physical dimensions 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 70
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.1
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 472
Other
Battery life - 420 images
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID BP-51 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage - SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $931 $1,398