Clicky

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony T900

Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front
Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
30
Overall
32

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony T900 Key Specs

Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Announced February 2014
Sony T900
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
  • Launched February 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony T900 Overview

On this page, we are contrasting the Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony T900, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the DP2 Quattro (20MP) and T900 (12MP) and the DP2 Quattro (APS-C) and T900 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The DP2 Quattro was unveiled 5 years after the T900 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the DP2 Quattro scores versus the T900 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Sony T900

 DP2 Quattro T900 
LaunchedFebruary 2014February 2009Newer by 61 months

Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 T900 DP2 Quattro 
Display dimensions3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution922k920kClearer display (+2k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony T900

 DP2 Quattro T900 
Manually focus Dial exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Sigma DP2 Quattro provides outer dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Sony T900 has proportions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).

Check out the Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony T900 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the DP2 Quattro and the T900.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony T900 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the DP2 Quattro and T900 is 70 and 96 respectively.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by seeing specs. The image underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the DP2 Quattro and T900.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The DP2 Quattro with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will produce extra detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The fresher DP2 Quattro should have an edge in sensor tech.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
Portrait photography with Sony T900
77
you can focus manually
good megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detect focusing
exports RAW files
27
has manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Street photography camera
Sony T900 as a Street photography camera
61
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
no moving screen
no image stabilization
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography highlights
Sony T900 Sports photography highlights
48
good megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (45mm)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
24
has image stabilization (Optical)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,000 seconds)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
low MP (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography highlights
Sony T900 Travel photography highlights
53
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
51
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse function
low MP (12MP)
does not offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
Landscape photography with Sony T900
59
you can focus manually
screen size is good (3")
good megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (45mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
36
has manual focus
big screen (3.5 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging factors
Sony T900 Vlogging factors
9
can't record video
28
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony T900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony T900
 Sigma DP2 QuattroSony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
General Information
Company Sigma Sony
Model type Sigma DP2 Quattro Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
Category Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Announced 2014-02-13 2009-02-17
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by TRUE III engine -
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 369.0mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 5424 x 3616 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 45mm (1x) 35-140mm (4.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8 f/3.5-10.0
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 3.5 inch
Display resolution 920k dots 922k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30s 2s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 395 gr (0.87 lb) 143 gr (0.32 lb)
Physical dimensions 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID BP-51 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage - Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Price at release $931 $300