Clicky

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W350

Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 front
Portability
97
Imaging
37
Features
25
Overall
32

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W350 Key Specs

Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Launched February 2014
Sony W350
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 91 x 52 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W350 Overview

Its time to look much closer at the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony W350, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Sigma and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the DP2 Quattro (20MP) and W350 (14MP) and the DP2 Quattro (APS-C) and W350 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The DP2 Quattro was launched 4 years later than the W350 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony W350 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the DP2 Quattro grades vs the W350 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Sony W350

 DP2 Quattro W350 
LaunchedFebruary 2014January 2010Fresher by 50 months
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony W350 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 W350 DP2 Quattro 

Common features in the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony W350

 DP2 Quattro W350 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W350 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Sigma DP2 Quattro enjoys external dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs) and the Sony W350 has dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") and a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Contrast the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony W350 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the DP2 Quattro versus the W350.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W350 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the DP2 Quattro and W350 is 70 and 97 respectively.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W350 top view buttons comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W350 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its hard to see the difference between sensor sizing only by reading specs. The graphic here may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the DP2 Quattro and W350.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The DP2 Quattro because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The younger DP2 Quattro is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W350 sensor size comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W350 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography features
Sony W350 Portrait photography features
77
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detection focus
supports RAW files
28
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Street photography camera
Sony W350 as a Street photography camera
61
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
58
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography features
Sony W350 Sports photography features
48
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
35
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography features
Sony W350 Travel photography features
53
megapixel count decent (20MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
66
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (26mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography information
Sony W350 Landscape photography information
59
has manual focus
screen size is decent (3")
megapixel count decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (45mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
38
rather wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
small screen (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging factors
Sony W350 Vlogging factors
9
can't record video
29
rather wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.7)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have mic jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony W350
 Sigma DP2 QuattroSony Cyber-shot DSC-W350
General Information
Brand Sigma Sony
Model Sigma DP2 Quattro Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350
Type Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Launched 2014-02-13 2010-01-07
Body design Large Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TRUE III engine Bionz
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 369.0mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5424 x 3616 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 45mm (1x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus distance - 10cm
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 920k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 secs 2 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.80 m
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 395g (0.87 lb) 117g (0.26 lb)
Dimensions 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") 91 x 52 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model BP-51 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage - Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $931 $200