Clicky

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W650

Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
32
Overall
36

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W650 Key Specs

Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Released February 2014
Sony W650
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
  • 124g - 94 x 56 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W650 Overview

Here, we are contrasting the Sigma DP2 Quattro versus Sony W650, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Sigma and Sony. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the DP2 Quattro (20MP) and W650 (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (APS-C) and W650 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The DP2 Quattro was announced 2 years later than the W650 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony W650 being a Compact camera.

Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the DP2 Quattro grades versus the W650 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Sony W650

 DP2 Quattro W650 
IntroducedFebruary 2014January 2012Fresher by 26 months
Focus manually Very exact focus
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony W650 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 W650 DP2 Quattro 

Common features in the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony W650

 DP2 Quattro W650 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display measurements
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W650 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Sigma DP2 Quattro offers exterior dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Sony W650 has dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).

Examine the Sigma DP2 Quattro versus Sony W650 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the DP2 Quattro against the W650.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W650 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the DP2 Quattro and W650 is 70 and 96 respectively.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W650 top view buttons comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W650 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizing only by reading specs. The photograph underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the DP2 Quattro and W650.

All in all, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The DP2 Quattro using its larger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will offer extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent DP2 Quattro will have an edge in sensor innovation.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W650 sensor size comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W650 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W650 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography factors
Sony W650 Portrait photography factors
77
manual focus
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
provides face detection focus
supports RAW files
34
megapixel count decent (16MP)
supports face detect focus
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography factors
Sony W650 Street photography factors
61
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
63
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (124 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography advice
Sony W650 Sports photography advice
48
good MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
lack of phase detect auto focus
40
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Travel photography camera
Sony W650 as a Travel photography camera
53
good MP (20 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
69
lighter than average (124 grams)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography info
Sony W650 Landscape photography info
59
manual focus
screen size is good (3 inches)
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
43
reasonably wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
lack of manual mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging factors
Sony W650 Vlogging factors
9
can't record video
33
reasonably wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focus
lighter than average (124g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony W650 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony W650
 Sigma DP2 QuattroSony Cyber-shot DSC-W650
General Information
Company Sigma Sony
Model type Sigma DP2 Quattro Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650
Class Large Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2014-02-13 2012-01-10
Physical type Large Sensor Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TRUE III engine BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.7mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 369.0mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5424 x 3616 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 9 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 45mm (1x) 25-125mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8 f/2.6-6.3
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 920k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech TFT color LCD Clear Photo TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 seconds 2 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.70 m
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 395g (0.87 lb) 124g (0.27 lb)
Physical dimensions 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") 94 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 220 shots
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID BP-51 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type - SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $931 $140