Clicky

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A65

Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
 
Sony SLT-A65 front
Portability
64
Imaging
63
Features
85
Overall
71

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A65 Key Specs

Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Released February 2014
Sony A65
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
  • Revealed November 2011
  • Refreshed by Sony A68
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A65 Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Sigma DP2 Quattro versus Sony A65, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Sigma and Sony. The resolution of the DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the A65 (24MP) is pretty similar and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (APS-C).

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The DP2 Quattro was introduced 2 years after the A65 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony A65 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the DP2 Quattro scores versus the A65 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Sony A65

 DP2 Quattro A65 
RevealedFebruary 2014November 2011More modern by 28 months

Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 A65 DP2 Quattro 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution921k920kCrisper screen (+1k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony A65

 DP2 Quattro A65 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Touch friendly screen Neither offers Touch friendly screen

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Sigma DP2 Quattro offers physical dimensions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs) while the Sony A65 has measurements of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") having a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).

Look at the Sigma DP2 Quattro versus Sony A65 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the DP2 Quattro and the A65.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A65 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the DP2 Quattro and A65 is 70 and 64 respectively.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A65 top view buttons comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading a spec sheet. The pic underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the DP2 Quattro and A65.

As you can see, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Sony A65 to deliver more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The newer DP2 Quattro is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A65 sensor size comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography details
Sony A65 Portrait photography details
77
focusing manually
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detect focusing
exports RAW files
77
manual focus
decent MP (24 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
includes face detection focus
delivers RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography details
Sony A65 Street photography details
61
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
77
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography details
Sony A65 Sports photography details
48
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect AF
81
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent MP (24 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
includes tracking autofocus
comes with phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
Travel photography with Sony A65
53
good megapixels (20MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.8)
68
decent MP (24 megapixels)
flash built-in
display is selfie friendly
missing Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography advice
Sony A65 Landscape photography advice
59
focusing manually
screen size is good (3 inches)
good megapixels (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
75
manual focus
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent MP (24 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging highlights
Sony A65 Vlogging highlights
9
no video
78
display is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
includes face detection focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does have external microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Sony A65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma DP2 Quattro and Sony A65
 Sigma DP2 QuattroSony SLT-A65
General Information
Brand Name Sigma Sony
Model Sigma DP2 Quattro Sony SLT-A65
Type Large Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2014-02-13 2011-11-15
Body design Large Sensor Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip TRUE III engine Bionz
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.7mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 369.0mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 24MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5424 x 3616 6000 x 4000
Maximum native ISO 6400 12800
Maximum enhanced ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 9 15
Cross focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 45mm (1x) -
Largest aperture f/2.8 -
Amount of lenses - 143
Crop factor 1.5 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 920k dot 921k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 10.00 m
Flash options no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 395 grams (0.87 pounds) 622 grams (1.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 74
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 717
Other
Battery life - 560 images
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model BP-51 NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media - SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $931 $700