Sigma DP3 Merrill vs Sony A9 II
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46


62 Imaging
75 Features
93 Overall
82
Sigma DP3 Merrill vs Sony A9 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 75mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Succeeded the Sigma DP2 Merrill
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Raise to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 678g - 129 x 96 x 76mm
- Announced October 2019
- Succeeded the Sony A9

Sigma DP3 Merrill vs Sony A9 II Overview
The following is a complete assessment of the Sigma DP3 Merrill vs Sony A9 II, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the DP3 Merrill (15MP) and A9 II (24MP) and the DP3 Merrill (APS-C) and A9 II (Full frame) come with different sensor sizing.

The DP3 Merrill was released 7 years earlier than the A9 II which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Sigma DP3 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sony A9 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the DP3 Merrill grades versus the A9 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sigma DP3 Merrill vs Sony A9 II Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sigma DP3 Merrill and Sony Alpha A9 Mark II. The complete galleries are viewable at Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery and Sony A9 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma DP3 Merrill over the Sony A9 II
DP3 Merrill | A9 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A9 II over the Sigma DP3 Merrill
A9 II | DP3 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2019 | ![]() | January 2013 | Newer by 81 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1440k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper display (+520k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Sigma DP3 Merrill and Sony A9 II
DP3 Merrill | A9 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Sigma DP3 Merrill vs Sony A9 II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Sigma DP3 Merrill enjoys external measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") accompanied by a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs) whilst the Sony A9 II has measurements of 129mm x 96mm x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 678 grams (1.49 lbs).
Look at the Sigma DP3 Merrill vs Sony A9 II in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the DP3 Merrill against the A9 II.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the DP3 Merrill and A9 II is 83 and 62 respectively.

Sigma DP3 Merrill vs Sony A9 II Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions only by viewing specifications. The pic here will give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the DP3 Merrill and A9 II.
Plainly, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The DP3 Merrill because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sony A9 II will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 9MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged DP3 Merrill will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Sigma DP3 Merrill vs Sony A9 II Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma DP3 Merrill vs Sony A9 II Specifications
Sigma DP3 Merrill | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Sigma | Sony |
Model | Sigma DP3 Merrill | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2019-10-03 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Dual TRUE II engine | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 24 x 16mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 384.0mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 15 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4704 x 3136 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 51200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 204800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 693 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 75mm (1x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,686 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | - | 1/8000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 20.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 330 gr (0.73 pounds) | 678 gr (1.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") | 129 x 96 x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 690 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous, 3 or 5 frames) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
Storage slots | Single | Two |
Cost at launch | $1,353 | $4,498 |