Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
78 Imaging
72 Features
59 Overall
66
Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Released April 2012
- Succeeded the Sigma SD1
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Sigma SD1 Merrill versus Sigma Quattro H, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless and both of them are designed by Sigma. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the SD1 Merrill (15MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the SD1 Merrill (APS-C) and Quattro H (APS-H) feature different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SD1 Merrill was unveiled 4 years prior to the Quattro H which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the SD1 Merrill grades versus the Quattro H with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Sigma SD1 Merrill & Sigma sd Quattro H. The full galleries are available at Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Sigma Quattro H
SD1 Merrill | Quattro H |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
Quattro H | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | April 2012 | Newer by 47 months | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 460k | Crisper display (+1160k dot) |
Common features in the Sigma SD1 Merrill and Sigma Quattro H
SD1 Merrill | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Sigma SD1 Merrill has got physical dimensions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") having a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro H has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
See the Sigma SD1 Merrill versus Sigma Quattro H in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the SD1 Merrill versus the Quattro H.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SD1 Merrill and Quattro H is 57 and 78 respectively.
Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by looking through technical specs. The picture here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SD1 Merrill and Quattro H.
As you can tell, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The SD1 Merrill with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Sigma Quattro H will provide you with extra detail having an extra 30MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SD1 Merrill will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
Sigma SD1 Merrill | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sigma | Sigma |
Model type | Sigma SD1 Merrill | Sigma sd Quattro H |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-04-10 | 2016-02-23 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Dual True II | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-H |
Sensor dimensions | 24 x 16mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 384.0mm² | 476.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 15 megapixels | 45 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4800 x 3200 | 6200 x 4152 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Sigma SA | Sigma SA |
Total lenses | 76 | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.4 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 1,620k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 96 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.64x | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.8fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Highest video resolution | None | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 790 grams (1.74 lb) | - |
Dimensions | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $2,339 | $1,134 |