Clicky

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony A3000

Portability
57
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51
Sigma SD1 Merrill front
 
Sony Alpha A3000 front
Portability
69
Imaging
62
Features
54
Overall
58

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony A3000 Key Specs

Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
  • Released April 2012
  • Replaced the Sigma SD1
Sony A3000
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
  • Launched August 2013
  • Refreshed by Sony a3500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony A3000 Overview

In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Sigma SD1 Merrill versus Sony A3000, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Sigma and Sony. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the SD1 Merrill (15MP) and A3000 (20MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (APS-C).

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The SD1 Merrill was unveiled 16 months earlier than the A3000 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A3000 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the SD1 Merrill matches up vs the A3000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Sony A3000

 SD1 Merrill A3000 
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A3000 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill

 A3000 SD1 Merrill 
LaunchedAugust 2013April 2012Fresher by 16 months

Common features in the Sigma SD1 Merrill and Sony A3000

 SD1 Merrill A3000 
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch screen Neither includes Touch screen

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony A3000 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and size. The Sigma SD1 Merrill features physical dimensions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") along with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs) and the Sony A3000 has specifications of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") along with a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).

Check out the Sigma SD1 Merrill versus Sony A3000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the SD1 Merrill versus the A3000.

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony A3000 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SD1 Merrill and A3000 is 57 and 69 respectively.

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony A3000 top view buttons comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony A3000 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing simply by checking technical specs. The visual underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SD1 Merrill and A3000.

As you can tell, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Sony A3000 to resolve extra detail having an extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older SD1 Merrill is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony A3000 sensor size comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony A3000 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony A3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill Portrait photography advice
Sony A3000 Portrait photography advice
65
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
does not have liveview
77
focusing manually
MP count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
provides face detection focusing
saves RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill Street photography information
Sony A3000 Street photography information
57
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
weather sealing
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
56
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
heavier than competition (411 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill Sports photography details
Sony A3000 Sports photography details
61
sensor resolution is decent (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
weather sealing
sensor has phase detect AF
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
59
MP count good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
provides tracking autofocus
better than average battery (470 per charge)
max frames per second very slow (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
lack of phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill Travel photography advice
Sony A3000 Travel photography advice
54
weather sealing
sensor resolution is decent (15MP)
does not have Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
60
better than average battery (470 CIPA)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (411 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A3000 as a Landscape photography camera
63
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
sensor resolution is decent (15 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
weather sealing
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
does not have Timelapse mode
70
focusing manually
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
good sized screen (3 inches)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
better than average battery (470 CIPA)
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Sigma SD1 Merrill
Vlogging with Sony A3000
9
no video shooting
26
provides face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have external mic jack
heavier than competition (411g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony A3000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma SD1 Merrill and Sony A3000
 Sigma SD1 MerrillSony Alpha A3000
General Information
Brand Sigma Sony
Model Sigma SD1 Merrill Sony Alpha A3000
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2012-04-10 2013-08-27
Body design Mid-size SLR SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip Dual True II BIONZ image
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor dimensions 24 x 16mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 384.0mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 15 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4800 x 3200 5456 x 3632
Maximum native ISO 6400 16000
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mount Sigma SA Sony E
Amount of lenses 76 121
Crop factor 1.5 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 460 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) Electronic
Viewfinder coverage 96% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.64x 0.47x
Features
Slowest shutter speed - 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed - 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100)
Flash settings no built-in flash Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync.
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - AVCHD, H.264, MP4
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 790g (1.74 lb) 411g (0.91 lb)
Dimensions 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 78
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.8
DXO Low light score not tested 1068
Other
Battery life - 470 pictures
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) -
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $2,339 $398