Clicky

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony QX1

Portability
57
Imaging
55
Features
45
Overall
51
Sigma SD1 Merrill front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
62
Features
48
Overall
56

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
  • Launched April 2012
  • Replaced the Sigma SD1
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Announced September 2014
Photography Glossary

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony QX1 Overview

Its time to look closer at the Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony QX1, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Lens-style by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the SD1 Merrill (15MP) and QX1 (20MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor size (APS-C).

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The SD1 Merrill was unveiled 3 years prior to the QX1 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summary of how the SD1 Merrill matches up vs the QX1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Sony QX1

 SD1 Merrill QX1 
Display size3""Larger display (+3")
Display resolution460k0kSharper display (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill

 QX1 SD1 Merrill 
AnnouncedSeptember 2014April 2012More modern by 29 months
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Sigma SD1 Merrill and Sony QX1

 SD1 Merrill QX1 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Sigma SD1 Merrill enjoys exterior measurements of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs) and the Sony QX1 has proportions of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") and a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

Check the Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony QX1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the SD1 Merrill and the QX1.

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the SD1 Merrill and QX1 is 57 and 90 respectively.

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading technical specs. The image underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the SD1 Merrill and QX1.

As you have seen, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony QX1 to offer you more detail having an extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged SD1 Merrill is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill Portrait photography highlights
Sony QX1 Portrait photography highlights
65
you can focus manually
good megapixels (15MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
65
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detection focus
saves RAW formats
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Sigma SD1 Merrill
Street photography with Sony QX1
57
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
environment sealing
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
69
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
provides focus by touch
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than competition in class (216 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill Sports photography highlights
Sony QX1 Sports photography highlights
60
good megapixels (15 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
environment sealing
comes with phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
56
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
better than average battery (440 CIPA)
max fps very slow (4.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill Travel photography highlights
Sony QX1 Travel photography highlights
53
environment sealing
good megapixels (15 megapixels)
does not have Time Lapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
71
better than average battery (440 CIPA)
provides focus by touch
decent megapixels (20MP)
has built in flash
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (216g)
screen is not selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Sigma SD1 Merrill
Landscape photography with Sony QX1
62
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
good megapixels (15MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
environment sealing
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
does not have Time Lapse mode
63
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
better than average battery (440 shots)
small screen ( inch)
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
no Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill Vlogging highlights
Sony QX1 Vlogging highlights
9
no video shooting
32
touchscreen enabled
includes face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
no external microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (216g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma SD1 Merrill and Sony QX1
 Sigma SD1 MerrillSony Alpha QX1
General Information
Company Sigma Sony
Model type Sigma SD1 Merrill Sony Alpha QX1
Type Advanced DSLR Lens-style
Launched 2012-04-10 2014-09-03
Physical type Mid-size SLR Lens-style
Sensor Information
Powered by Dual True II Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor measurements 24 x 16mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor surface area 384.0mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 15MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 4800 x 3200 5456 x 3632
Max native ISO 6400 16000
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mount type Sigma SA Sony E
Number of lenses 76 -
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1.6
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches -
Screen resolution 460 thousand dots 0 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 96% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.64x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed - 30s
Maximum shutter speed - 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate - 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings no built-in flash Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 790 grams (1.74 pounds) 216 grams (0.48 pounds)
Physical dimensions 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 440 photos
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Card slots One One
Launch cost $2,339 $500