Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony TX200V
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Introduced April 2012
- Earlier Model is Sigma SD1
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched January 2012
Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony TX200V Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony TX200V, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Sigma and Sony. The sensor resolution of the SD1 Merrill (15MP) and the TX200V (18MP) is pretty close but the SD1 Merrill (APS-C) and TX200V (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SD1 Merrill was revealed 3 months after the TX200V and they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a simple summation of how the SD1 Merrill scores against the TX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Sigma SD1 Merrill and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The full galleries are viewable at Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery and Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Sony TX200V
SD1 Merrill | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
TX200V | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 460k | Sharper screen (+770k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Sigma SD1 Merrill and Sony TX200V
SD1 Merrill | TX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2012 | January 2012 | Same generation | |
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Sigma SD1 Merrill has outer dimensions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") along with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs) while the Sony TX200V has dimensions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony TX200V in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the SD1 Merrill vs the TX200V.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SD1 Merrill and TX200V is 57 and 96 respectively.
Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes only by viewing specifications. The picture below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SD1 Merrill and TX200V.
Plainly, the 2 cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The SD1 Merrill with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Sony TX200V will render greater detail because of its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a little more aggressively.
Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony TX200V Specifications
Sigma SD1 Merrill | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Sigma | Sony |
Model type | Sigma SD1 Merrill | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2012-04-10 | 2012-01-30 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Dual True II | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 24 x 16mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 384.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 15MP | 18MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4800 x 3200 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 76 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3.3" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 96% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.64x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | - | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.10 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 790g (1.74 lbs) | 129g (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $2,339 | $500 |