Clicky

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony W320

Portability
57
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51
Sigma SD1 Merrill front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
  • Launched April 2012
  • Superseded the Sigma SD1
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony W320 Overview

On this page, we will be evaluating the Sigma SD1 Merrill and Sony W320, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. The resolution of the SD1 Merrill (15MP) and the W320 (14MP) is relatively well matched but the SD1 Merrill (APS-C) and W320 (1/2.3") have different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The SD1 Merrill was revealed 2 years after the W320 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the SD1 Merrill grades versus the W320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Sony W320

 SD1 Merrill W320 
AnnouncedApril 2012January 2010Newer by 28 months
Focus manually More accurate focus
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill

 W320 SD1 Merrill 

Common features in the Sigma SD1 Merrill and Sony W320

 SD1 Merrill W320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch screen Neither includes Touch screen

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Sigma SD1 Merrill features outside measurements of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") having a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs) and the Sony W320 has dimensions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Take a look at the Sigma SD1 Merrill and Sony W320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the SD1 Merrill compared to the W320.

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony W320 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SD1 Merrill and W320 is 57 and 97 respectively.

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specifications. The image here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the SD1 Merrill and W320.

Plainly, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SD1 Merrill using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will give more detail because of its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher SD1 Merrill provides a benefit in sensor tech.

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill Portrait photography features
Sony W320 Portrait photography features
65
focusing manually
MP count decent (15MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
does not have liveview
28
MP count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill Street photography highlights
Sony W320 Street photography highlights
57
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
weather proof
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
49
fixed screen
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill Sports photography details
Sony W320 Sports photography details
61
MP count decent (15MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
weather proof
has phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
26
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill Travel photography highlights
Sony W320 Travel photography highlights
54
weather proof
MP count decent (15MP)
lack of Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
66
MP count decent (14MP)
has built in flash
really wide (26mm)
no Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Sigma SD1 Merrill
Landscape photography with Sony W320
63
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
decent sized screen (3")
MP count decent (15 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
weather proof
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse function
33
really wide (26mm)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Sigma SD1 Merrill
Vlogging with Sony W320
9
no video
26
really wide (26mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
no external mic jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma SD1 Merrill and Sony W320
 Sigma SD1 MerrillSony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Brand Name Sigma Sony
Model Sigma SD1 Merrill Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Class Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Launched 2012-04-10 2010-01-07
Body design Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip Dual True II -
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 24 x 16mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 384.0mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 15 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4800 x 3200 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Sigma SA fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-105mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus distance - 4cm
Amount of lenses 76 -
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 96 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.64x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed - 1s
Fastest shutter speed - 1/1600s
Continuous shutter speed - 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 4.80 m
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 790 gr (1.74 lbs) 117 gr (0.26 lbs)
Physical dimensions 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - NP-BN1
Self timer Yes Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $2,339 $269