Clicky

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony A35

Portability
57
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51
Sigma SD1 Merrill front
 
Sony SLT-A35 front
Portability
69
Imaging
57
Features
70
Overall
62

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony A35 Key Specs

Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
  • Introduced April 2012
  • Superseded the Sigma SD1
Sony A35
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 415g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
  • Introduced September 2011
  • Replaced the Sony A33
  • Replacement is Sony A37
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony A35 Overview

Following is a in-depth review of the Sigma SD1 Merrill versus Sony A35, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Sigma and Sony. The image resolution of the SD1 Merrill (15MP) and the A35 (16MP) is very similar and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (APS-C).

Photography Glossary

The SD1 Merrill was unveiled 7 months after the A35 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the SD1 Merrill matches up against the A35 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Sony A35

 SD1 Merrill A35 
IntroducedApril 2012September 2011More modern by 7 months

Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill

 A35 SD1 Merrill 
Display resolution921k460kClearer display (+461k dot)

Common features in the Sigma SD1 Merrill and Sony A35

 SD1 Merrill A35 
Manual focus More precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry around your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Sigma SD1 Merrill enjoys exterior measurements of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") along with a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs) whilst the Sony A35 has dimensions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") along with a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).

Take a look at the Sigma SD1 Merrill versus Sony A35 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the SD1 Merrill versus the A35.

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony A35 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SD1 Merrill and A35 is 57 and 69 respectively.

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony A35 top view buttons comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very tough to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over a spec sheet. The pic underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SD1 Merrill and A35.

As you can see, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Sony A35 to offer more detail having an extra 1MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The fresher SD1 Merrill is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony A35 sensor size comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony A35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Sigma SD1 Merrill
Portrait photography with Sony A35
65
manual focus
good MP (15MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no liveview
74
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
features face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill Street photography highlights
Sony A35 Street photography highlights
57
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
weather proof
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
71
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lighter than competition (415 grams)
very good high ISO (25,600)
no articulating screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Sports photography camera
Sony A35 as a Sports photography camera
61
good MP (15 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
weather proof
has phase detect auto focus
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
61
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
has phase detect autofocus
low fps (6.0 frames per second)
terrible battery (440 per charge)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill Travel photography features
Sony A35 Travel photography features
54
weather proof
good MP (15MP)
no Time Lapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
59
lighter than competition (415g)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse mode
terrible battery (440 shots)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill Landscape photography advice
Sony A35 Landscape photography advice
63
manual focus
switch lenses (Sigma SA mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
good MP (15 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
weather proof
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
no Time Lapse mode
69
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
very good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
terrible battery (440 shots)
lack of Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma SD1 Merrill as a Vlogging camera
Sony A35 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video
36
image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has microphone port
lighter than competition (415 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sigma SD1 Merrill vs Sony A35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma SD1 Merrill and Sony A35
 Sigma SD1 MerrillSony SLT-A35
General Information
Company Sigma Sony
Model Sigma SD1 Merrill Sony SLT-A35
Class Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2012-04-10 2011-09-20
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Dual True II Bionz
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor measurements 24 x 16mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 384.0mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 15 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4800 x 3200 4912 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 6400 25600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 15
Cross focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mounting type Sigma SA Sony/Minolta Alpha
Available lenses 76 143
Crop factor 1.5 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 460k dot 921k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,150k dot
Viewfinder coverage 96 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.64x 0.73x
Features
Slowest shutter speed - 30s
Maximum shutter speed - 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed - 6.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 12.00 m
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 790 gr (1.74 pounds) 415 gr (0.91 pounds)
Dimensions 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 74
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.3
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.7
DXO Low light score not tested 763
Other
Battery life - 440 images
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Launch pricing $2,339 $598