Sigma SD1 vs Sony T900
77 Imaging
54 Features
43 Overall
49
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Sigma SD1 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Announced September 2010
- Later Model is Sigma SD1 Merrill
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Sigma SD1 vs Sony T900 Overview
Here is a comprehensive assessment of the Sigma SD1 vs Sony T900, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Sigma and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the SD1 (15MP) and T900 (12MP) and the SD1 (APS-C) and T900 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SD1 was released 20 months later than the T900 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Sigma SD1 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the SD1 scores versus the T900 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Sigma SD1 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Sigma SD1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are provided at Sigma SD1 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 over the Sony T900
| SD1 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2010 | February 2009 | Fresher by 20 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Sigma SD1
| T900 | SD1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Sigma SD1 and Sony T900
| SD1 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Sigma SD1 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Sigma SD1 comes with outer dimensions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has specifications of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
See the Sigma SD1 vs Sony T900 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at the time. Here is the front view size comparison of the SD1 and the T900.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the SD1 and T900 is 77 and 96 respectively.
Sigma SD1 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing only by checking technical specs. The visual below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SD1 and T900.
As you can tell, the two cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SD1 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sigma SD1 will give more detail as a result of its extra 3MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent SD1 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Sigma SD1 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Sigma SD1 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Sigma SD1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Sigma | Sony |
| Model type | Sigma SD1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-09-21 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Dual True II | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 24 x 16mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 384.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 15 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4800 x 3200 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | - | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | 2 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Available lenses | 76 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 96 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.64x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 143 grams (0.32 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $2,339 | $300 |