Sigma SD9 vs Sony A350
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
62 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
Sigma SD9 vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched November 2002
- Later Model is Sigma SD10
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Introduced June 2008
- Later Model is Sony A380
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Sigma SD9 vs Sony A350 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Sigma SD9 versus Sony A350, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the SD9 (3MP) and A350 (14MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (APS-C).
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe SD9 was launched 6 years before the A350 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the SD9 grades vs the A350 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Sigma SD9 vs Sony A350 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Sigma SD9 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A350. The complete galleries are provided at Sigma SD9 Gallery & Sony A350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Sony A350
| SD9 | A350 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Sigma SD9
| A350 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2008 | November 2002 | More recent by 67 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display size | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 130k | Sharper display (+100k dot) |
Common features in the Sigma SD9 and Sony A350
| SD9 | A350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Sigma SD9 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Sigma SD9 enjoys exterior measurements of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs) whilst the Sony A350 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).
Compare the Sigma SD9 versus Sony A350 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the SD9 vs the A350.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SD9 and A350 is 54 and 62 respectively.
Sigma SD9 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by going over specifications. The visual below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SD9 and A350.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Sony A350 to deliver more detail utilizing its extra 11MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older SD9 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Sigma SD9 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Sigma SD9 vs Sony A350 Specifications
| Sigma SD9 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sigma | Sony |
| Model | Sigma SD9 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2002-11-26 | 2008-06-06 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 20.7 x 13.8mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 285.7mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 3 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 2268 x 1512 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Sigma SA | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Number of lenses | 76 | 143 |
| Crop factor | 1.7 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 1.8 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 130 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 98% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.77x | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/6000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Highest video resolution | None | None |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 950 grams (2.09 pounds) | 674 grams (1.49 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 65 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 595 |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash Type I or II | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $3,001 | $600 |