Sigma SD9 vs Sony A6300
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
83 Imaging
66 Features
82 Overall
72
Sigma SD9 vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched November 2002
- Renewed by Sigma SD10
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Earlier Model is Sony A6000
- Successor is Sony A6500
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Sigma SD9 vs Sony A6300 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Sigma SD9 vs Sony A6300, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Sigma and Sony. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the SD9 (3MP) and A6300 (24MP) but they feature the same exact sensor size (APS-C).
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SD9 was released 14 years prior to the A6300 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a short introduction of how the SD9 matches up against the A6300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Sigma SD9 vs Sony A6300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Sigma SD9 & Sony Alpha a6300. The complete galleries are available at Sigma SD9 Gallery & Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Sony A6300
| SD9 | A6300 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Sigma SD9
| A6300 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2016 | November 2002 | More recent by 160 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 130k | Sharper screen (+792k dot) |
Common features in the Sigma SD9 and Sony A6300
| SD9 | A6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Sigma SD9 vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Sigma SD9 comes with outside measurements of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs) whilst the Sony A6300 has proportions of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Contrast the Sigma SD9 vs Sony A6300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the SD9 versus the A6300.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SD9 and A6300 is 54 and 83 respectively.
Sigma SD9 vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by viewing technical specs. The visual below should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SD9 and A6300.
As you have seen, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Sony A6300 to result in extra detail as a result of its extra 21 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The older SD9 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Sigma SD9 vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Sigma SD9 vs Sony A6300 Specifications
| Sigma SD9 | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Sigma | Sony |
| Model | Sigma SD9 | Sony Alpha a6300 |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2002-11-26 | 2016-02-03 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 20.7 x 13.8mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 285.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 3 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 2268 x 1512 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 25600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 425 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Sigma SA | Sony E |
| Available lenses | 76 | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.7 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 130 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 98% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.77x | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/6000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 11.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | - | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 950g (2.09 lbs) | 404g (0.89 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 85 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.7 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1437 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
| Type of storage | Compact Flash Type I or II | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $3,001 | $889 |