Sigma SD9 vs Sony H400
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
62 Imaging
44 Features
41 Overall
42
Sigma SD9 vs Sony H400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched November 2002
- Newer Model is Sigma SD10
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Revealed February 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Sigma SD9 vs Sony H400 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Sigma SD9 versus Sony H400, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Sigma and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the SD9 (3MP) and H400 (20MP) and the SD9 (APS-C) and H400 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SD9 was brought out 12 years before the H400 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony H400 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the SD9 matches up against the H400 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Sigma SD9 vs Sony H400 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Sigma SD9 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The entire galleries are provided at Sigma SD9 Gallery & Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Sony H400
| SD9 | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Sigma SD9
| H400 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | November 2002 | More modern by 136 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 130k | Crisper screen (+330k dot) |
Common features in the Sigma SD9 and Sony H400
| SD9 | H400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Sigma SD9 vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Sigma SD9 offers outside measurements of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") and a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs) and the Sony H400 has proportions of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") and a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
See the Sigma SD9 versus Sony H400 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the SD9 against the H400.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SD9 and H400 is 54 and 62 respectively.
Sigma SD9 vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes just by looking at specs. The pic below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SD9 and H400.
All in all, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The SD9 because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Sony H400 will give you greater detail having its extra 17MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged SD9 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Sigma SD9 vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Sigma SD9 vs Sony H400 Specifications
| Sigma SD9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sigma | Sony |
| Model type | Sigma SD9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2002-11-26 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz(R) |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 20.7 x 13.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 285.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 3 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 2268 x 1512 | 5152 x 3864 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.4-6.5 |
| Total lenses | 76 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.7 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 130k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | Clear Photo LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.77x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/6000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.80 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 X 720 |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 950 grams (2.09 lb) | 628 grams (1.38 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash Type I or II | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $3,001 | $268 |