Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX1
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Announced November 2002
- New Model is Sigma SD10
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Announced August 2009
Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX1 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Sigma SD9 and Sony TX1, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the SD9 (3MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the SD9 (APS-C) and TX1 (1/2.4") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SD9 was unveiled 7 years earlier than the TX1 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the SD9 grades against the TX1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Sigma SD9 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The full galleries are available at Sigma SD9 Gallery & Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Sony TX1
SD9 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Sigma SD9
TX1 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2009 | November 2002 | More recent by 81 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 130k | Sharper screen (+100k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Sigma SD9 and Sony TX1
SD9 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera, you have to think about its weight and size. The Sigma SD9 provides outer dimensions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs) and the Sony TX1 has specifications of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Look at the Sigma SD9 and Sony TX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the SD9 against the TX1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SD9 and TX1 is 54 and 96 respectively.
Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by checking specifications. The photograph underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SD9 and TX1.
Plainly, the two cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SD9 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Sony TX1 will resolve more detail having an extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older SD9 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX1 Specifications
Sigma SD9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Sigma | Sony |
Model | Sigma SD9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2002-11-26 | 2009-08-06 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 20.7 x 13.8mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 285.7mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 3MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 2268 x 1512 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 8cm |
Amount of lenses | 76 | - |
Crop factor | 1.7 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 130 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.77x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/6000s | 1/1250s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 950g (2.09 lb) | 142g (0.31 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash Type I or II | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $3,001 | $350 |