Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX200V
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Introduced November 2002
- Newer Model is Sigma SD10
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Announced January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX200V Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Sigma SD9 versus Sony TX200V, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the SD9 (3MP) and TX200V (18MP) and the SD9 (APS-C) and TX200V (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SD9 was released 10 years earlier than the TX200V and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the SD9 matches up vs the TX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Sigma SD9 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The complete galleries are viewable at Sigma SD9 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Sony TX200V
| SD9 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Sigma SD9
| TX200V | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | November 2002 | Fresher by 111 months |
| Display dimensions | 3.3" |  | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 130k | Crisper display (+1100k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Sigma SD9 and Sony TX200V
| SD9 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Sigma SD9 comes with outside dimensions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") and a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs) whilst the Sony TX200V has dimensions of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Sigma SD9 versus Sony TX200V in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the SD9 against the TX200V.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SD9 and TX200V is 54 and 96 respectively.
Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The graphic below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SD9 and TX200V.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SD9 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Sony TX200V will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 15 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older SD9 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Sigma SD9 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Sigma SD9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sigma | Sony |
| Model type | Sigma SD9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2002-11-26 | 2012-01-30 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 20.7 x 13.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 285.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 3MP | 18MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 2268 x 1512 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Number of lenses | 76 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.7 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 1.8 inches | 3.3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 130 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 98% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.77x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 2 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/6000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 950g (2.09 lbs) | 129g (0.28 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash Type I or II | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $3,001 | $500 |
