Clicky

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W220

Portability
54
Imaging
39
Features
27
Overall
34
Sigma SD9 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W220 Key Specs

Sigma SD9
(Full Review)
  • 3MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400
  • 1/6000s Max Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
  • Revealed November 2002
  • Updated by Sigma SD10
Sony W220
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
  • 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W220 Overview

Below is a thorough analysis of the Sigma SD9 vs Sony W220, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Sigma and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the SD9 (3MP) and W220 (12MP) and the SD9 (APS-C) and W220 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The SD9 was unveiled 7 years earlier than the W220 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W220 being a Compact camera.

Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the SD9 scores versus the W220 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Sony W220

 SD9 W220 

Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Sigma SD9

 W220 SD9 
AnnouncedJanuary 2009November 2002More recent by 74 months
Screen dimensions2.7"1.8"Bigger screen (+0.9")
Screen resolution230k130kCrisper screen (+100k dot)

Common features in the Sigma SD9 and Sony W220

 SD9 W220 
Focus manually Very exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither comes with Touch friendly screen

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Sigma SD9 comes with external measurements of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") and a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs) and the Sony W220 has measurements of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).

Check the Sigma SD9 vs Sony W220 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the SD9 compared to the W220.

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W220 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SD9 and W220 is 54 and 95 respectively.

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W220 top view buttons comparison

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by seeing specs. The visual underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SD9 and W220.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SD9 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony W220 will produce more detail having an extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older SD9 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W220 sensor size comparison

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Sigma SD9
Portrait photography with Sony W220
47
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview feature
megapixel count low (3MP)
27
manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Sigma SD9 as a Street photography camera
Sony W220 as a Street photography camera
43
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than others (950 grams)
maximum ISO low (400)
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Sigma SD9 Sports photography factors
Sony W220 Sports photography factors
36
high shutter speed (1/6,000s)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (3MP)
does not have phase detect AF
25
has image stabilization (Optical)
slow frames per second (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Sigma SD9
Travel photography with Sony W220
29
no Timelapse recording
more heavy than others (950g)
megapixel count low (3 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
51
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
MP count low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (30mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Sigma SD9 Landscape photography info
Sony W220 Landscape photography info
41
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (1.8")
no liveview feature
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (3 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
no Timelapse recording
32
manual focus
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (30mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma SD9 Vlogging details
Sony W220 Vlogging details
9
lack of video recording
25
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not great (30mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of mic support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W220 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma SD9 and Sony W220
 Sigma SD9Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220
General Information
Brand Sigma Sony
Model Sigma SD9 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2002-11-26 2009-01-08
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 20.7 x 13.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 285.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 3 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 2268 x 1512 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount Sigma SA fixed lens
Lens focal range - 30-120mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8-7.1
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Total lenses 76 -
Crop factor 1.7 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 1.8 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 130 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 98% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.77x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 1 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/6000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 7.10 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings - Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps)
Highest video resolution None 640x480
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 950 grams (2.09 lbs) 147 grams (0.32 lbs)
Physical dimensions 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash Type I or II Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $3,001 $160