Sigma SD9 vs Sony W290
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
94 Imaging
34 Features
28 Overall
31
Sigma SD9 vs Sony W290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Revealed November 2002
- Successor is Sigma SD10
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 98 x 57 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
Sigma SD9 vs Sony W290 Overview
Here is a in-depth analysis of the Sigma SD9 vs Sony W290, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Sigma and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the SD9 (3MP) and W290 (12MP) and the SD9 (APS-C) and W290 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SD9 was manufactured 7 years earlier than the W290 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W290 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the SD9 matches up versus the W290 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sigma SD9 vs Sony W290 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sigma SD9 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290. The entire galleries are provided at Sigma SD9 Gallery and Sony W290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Sony W290
SD9 | W290 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony W290 over the Sigma SD9
W290 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2009 | November 2002 | Fresher by 75 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 130k | Sharper display (+100k dot) |
Common features in the Sigma SD9 and Sony W290
SD9 | W290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Sigma SD9 vs Sony W290 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Sigma SD9 provides outside measurements of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs) and the Sony W290 has dimensions of 98mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Sigma SD9 vs Sony W290 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the SD9 compared to the W290.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SD9 and W290 is 54 and 94 respectively.
Sigma SD9 vs Sony W290 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through specifications. The photograph below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SD9 and W290.
To sum up, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The SD9 due to its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony W290 will resolve extra detail due to its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older SD9 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Sigma SD9 vs Sony W290 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma SD9 vs Sony W290 Specifications
Sigma SD9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sigma | Sony |
Model type | Sigma SD9 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2002-11-26 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 20.7 x 13.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 285.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 3MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 2268 x 1512 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Available lenses | 76 | - |
Crop factor | 1.7 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 130k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.77x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 2 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/6000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.90 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 950g (2.09 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") | 98 x 57 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash Type I or II | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $3,001 | $230 |