Clicky

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W310

Portability
54
Imaging
39
Features
27
Overall
34
Sigma SD9 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310 front
Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W310 Key Specs

Sigma SD9
(Full Review)
  • 3MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400
  • 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
  • Revealed November 2002
  • Updated by Sigma SD10
Sony W310
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-112mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
  • 137g - 95 x 55 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W310 Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Sigma SD9 versus Sony W310, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the SD9 (3MP) and W310 (12MP) and the SD9 (APS-C) and W310 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The SD9 was revealed 8 years earlier than the W310 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W310 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief overview of how the SD9 matches up vs the W310 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Sony W310

 SD9 W310 
Manually focus Very accurate focus

Reasons to pick Sony W310 over the Sigma SD9

 W310 SD9 
IntroducedJanuary 2010November 2002More recent by 86 months
Display sizing2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k130kCrisper display (+100k dot)

Common features in the Sigma SD9 and Sony W310

 SD9 W310 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W310 Physical Comparison

When you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Sigma SD9 provides physical dimensions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs) whilst the Sony W310 has specifications of 95mm x 55mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).

Examine the Sigma SD9 versus Sony W310 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the SD9 compared to the W310.

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W310 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SD9 and W310 is 54 and 96 respectively.

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W310 top view buttons comparison

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W310 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements only by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SD9 and W310.

Clearly, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The SD9 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Sony W310 will offer you extra detail because of its extra 9MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The older SD9 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W310 sensor size comparison

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W310 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Sigma SD9
Portrait photography with Sony W310
47
manual focus
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
no liveview feature
low resolution (3MP)
21
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Sigma SD9
Street photography with Sony W310
43
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
heavier than competition (950 grams)
max ISO too low (400)
57
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sigma SD9 Sports photography features
Sony W310 Sports photography features
36
high shutter speed (1/6,000 seconds)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (3 megapixels)
no phase detect AF
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Sigma SD9 Travel photography features
Sony W310 Travel photography features
29
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (950 grams)
low resolution (3 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
58
has built in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
low megapixels (12MP)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Sigma SD9 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony W310 as a Landscape photography camera
41
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
small screen (1.8 inch)
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (3MP)
max ISO too low (400)
lack of Time Lapse mode
32
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
low megapixels (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma SD9 as a Vlogging camera
Sony W310 as a Vlogging camera
9
can't record video
29
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of microphone support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W310 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma SD9 and Sony W310
 Sigma SD9Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310
General Information
Company Sigma Sony
Model type Sigma SD9 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310
Class Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Revealed 2002-11-26 2010-01-07
Physical type Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 20.7 x 13.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 285.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 3MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 2268 x 1512 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support Sigma SA fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-112mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.0-5.8
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Available lenses 76 -
Crop factor 1.7 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 1.8 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 130k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 98 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.77x -
Features
Min shutter speed 30 secs 1 secs
Max shutter speed 1/6000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.00 m
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 950 grams (2.09 pounds) 137 grams (0.30 pounds)
Dimensions 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") 95 x 55 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (10 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash Type I or II SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $3,001 $150