Clicky

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W320

Portability
54
Imaging
38
Features
27
Overall
33
Sigma SD9 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Sigma SD9
(Full Review)
  • 3MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400
  • 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
  • Announced November 2002
  • Successor is Sigma SD10
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2010
Photography Glossary

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W320 Overview

Below is a in depth review of the Sigma SD9 versus Sony W320, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Sigma and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the SD9 (3MP) and W320 (14MP) and the SD9 (APS-C) and W320 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The SD9 was manufactured 8 years earlier than the W320 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summation of how the SD9 grades against the W320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Sony W320

 SD9 W320 
Manually focus More exact focusing

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Sigma SD9

 W320 SD9 
AnnouncedJanuary 2010November 2002More recent by 86 months
Display dimensions2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k130kSharper display (+100k dot)

Common features in the Sigma SD9 and Sony W320

 SD9 W320 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Sigma SD9 enjoys exterior dimensions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") and a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs) whilst the Sony W320 has dimensions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Take a look at the Sigma SD9 versus Sony W320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the SD9 vs the W320.

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W320 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SD9 and W320 is 54 and 97 respectively.

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements just by researching specifications. The graphic here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SD9 and W320.

To sum up, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SD9 featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony W320 will result in more detail due to its extra 11MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The older SD9 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Sigma SD9
Portrait photography with Sony W320
46
has manual focus
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
low resolution sensor (3 megapixels)
28
MP count good (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Sigma SD9 as a Street photography camera
Sony W320 as a Street photography camera
43
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
heavier than competition in class (950g)
max ISO too low (400)
48
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sigma SD9 as a Sports photography camera
Sony W320 as a Sports photography camera
35
great max shutter speed (1/6,000 seconds)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (3MP)
no phase detect AF
26
MP count good (14MP)
max fps very slow (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Sigma SD9 as a Travel photography camera
Sony W320 as a Travel photography camera
29
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (950 grams)
low resolution sensor (3MP)
does not have selfie friendly screen
66
MP count good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (26mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.7)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Sigma SD9 Landscape photography highlights
Sony W320 Landscape photography highlights
40
has manual focus
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (1.8")
doesn't have liveview
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (3 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
missing Time Lapse recording
33
fairly wide (26mm)
MP count good (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.7)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma SD9 Vlogging features
Sony W320 Vlogging features
9
no video recording
26
fairly wide (26mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.7)
does not have a selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sigma SD9 vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma SD9 and Sony W320
 Sigma SD9Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Manufacturer Sigma Sony
Model Sigma SD9 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Class Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Announced 2002-11-26 2010-01-07
Physical type Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 20.7 x 13.8mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 285.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 3 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 2268 x 1512 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount Sigma SA fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-105mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus range - 4cm
Total lenses 76 -
Crop factor 1.7 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 1.8 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 130 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 98% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.77x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 secs 1 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/6000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 4.80 m
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 640x480
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 950g (2.09 pounds) 117g (0.26 pounds)
Physical dimensions 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (10 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash Type I or II SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $3,001 $269