Sigma SD9 vs Sony A35
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d88a7/d88a7812e71c59a9e4e86f9ed56f4270378edf4e" alt="Sigma SD9 front Sigma SD9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a4a1/1a4a1e9ae5851412bf5c0adc402e8817737aa48f" alt="Sony SLT-A35 front Sony SLT-A35 front"
69 Imaging
56 Features
70 Overall
61
Sigma SD9 vs Sony A35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Released November 2002
- Renewed by Sigma SD10
(Full Review)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sigma SD9 vs Sony A35 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Sigma SD9 vs Sony A35, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Sigma and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the SD9 (3MP) and A35 (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizing (APS-C).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The SD9 was launched 9 years prior to the A35 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the SD9 scores versus the A35 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sigma SD9 vs Sony A35 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Sigma SD9 & Sony SLT-A35. The complete galleries are viewable at Sigma SD9 Gallery & Sony A35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Sony A35
SD9 | A35 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Sigma SD9
A35 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2011 | ![]() | November 2002 | More recent by 107 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 130k | Clearer screen (+791k dot) |
Common features in the Sigma SD9 and Sony A35
SD9 | A35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Sigma SD9 vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Sigma SD9 provides outside measurements of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs) while the Sony A35 has dimensions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") and a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).
Contrast the Sigma SD9 vs Sony A35 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the SD9 and the A35.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7945/e7945a464b9c239abbcf5bb42d0787f18f7e25da" alt="Sigma SD9 vs Sony A35 size comparison Sigma SD9 vs Sony A35 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SD9 and A35 is 54 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eeb79/eeb7998639f617f50d30e722798ef48b3c85318c" alt="Sigma SD9 vs Sony A35 top view buttons comparison Sigma SD9 vs Sony A35 top view buttons comparison"
Sigma SD9 vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading a spec sheet. The graphic below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SD9 and A35.
As you can see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Sony A35 to deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 13MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older SD9 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa951/fa951c36862efcb7c8e7337a5c6a1ff36ec595f8" alt="Sigma SD9 vs Sony A35 sensor size comparison Sigma SD9 vs Sony A35 sensor size comparison"
Sigma SD9 vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb64b/bb64b970b80f399ae9adccfba24682f77f5c2087" alt="Sigma SD9 vs Sony A35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Sigma SD9 vs Sony A35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sigma SD9 vs Sony A35 Specifications
Sigma SD9 | Sony SLT-A35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sigma | Sony |
Model | Sigma SD9 | Sony SLT-A35 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2002-11-26 | 2011-09-20 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 20.7 x 13.8mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 285.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 3MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 2268 x 1512 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Sigma SA | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Amount of lenses | 76 | 143 |
Crop factor | 1.7 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 1.8" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 130 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 98% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.77x | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/6000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 12.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 950g (2.09 lbs) | 415g (0.91 lbs) |
Dimensions | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 763 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 440 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash Type I or II | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $3,001 | $598 |