Sigma fp vs Sony A200
84 Imaging
75 Features
79 Overall
76
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d2fe/1d2fed2caf199c62565b698420d940e61084850d" alt="Sigma fp front Sigma fp front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce1bd/ce1bd4afb5eccaaa76aec2b4878f9b3d2cf0fd48" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front"
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Sigma fp vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Introduced July 2019
- Successor is Sigma fp L
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Revealed July 2008
- Replacement is Sony A230
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sigma fp vs Sony A200 Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Sigma fp versus Sony A200, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Sigma and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the fp (25MP) and A200 (10MP) and the fp (Full frame) and A200 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The fp was brought out 11 years after the A200 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Sigma fp being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the fp scores versus the A200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sigma fp vs Sony A200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Sigma fp and Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The entire galleries are provided at Sigma fp Gallery and Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Sony A200
fp | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2019 | ![]() | July 2008 | Newer by 134 months |
Screen dimensions | 3.2" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 2100k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+1870k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Sigma fp
A200 | fp |
---|
Common features in the Sigma fp and Sony A200
fp | A200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Sigma fp vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Sigma fp has outer dimensions of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs) while the Sony A200 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Look at the Sigma fp versus Sony A200 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the fp against the A200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd8b5/bd8b5c00f9d01e8d68d178ac2aba5a41a4e31b9f" alt="Sigma fp vs Sony A200 size comparison Sigma fp vs Sony A200 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the fp and A200 is 84 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04025/04025641e6816c80cb6ccf154e8927276d3defc3" alt="Sigma fp vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison Sigma fp vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison"
Sigma fp vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions only by looking at specs. The picture below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the fp and A200.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The fp featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Sigma fp will resolve greater detail having its extra 15 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent fp is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94e8e/94e8ec9e7c439dafa9e63a559a3f6160a2053d39" alt="Sigma fp vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison Sigma fp vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison"
Sigma fp vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9fdfd/9fdfd91755e6b6002a6096430a03bf7569935a79" alt="Sigma fp vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Sigma fp vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sigma fp vs Sony A200 Specifications
Sigma fp | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Sigma | Sony |
Model type | Sigma fp | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2019-07-11 | 2008-07-17 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 35.9 x 23.9mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 858.0mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 25MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | 102400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 6 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica L | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Total lenses | 30 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.2" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 2,100 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 12.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | No | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 422 gr (0.93 lbs) | 572 gr (1.26 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 63 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | BP-51 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 wec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | Compact Flash |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $2,050 | $100 |