Sigma fp vs Sony A350
84 Imaging
75 Features
79 Overall
76
62 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
Sigma fp vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Introduced July 2019
- Replacement is Sigma fp L
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Revealed June 2008
- Successor is Sony A380
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Sigma fp vs Sony A350 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Sigma fp and Sony A350, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Sigma and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the fp (25MP) and A350 (14MP) and the fp (Full frame) and A350 (APS-C) feature different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe fp was revealed 11 years later than the A350 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Sigma fp being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving in to a complete comparison, below is a brief overview of how the fp scores versus the A350 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Sigma fp vs Sony A350 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sigma fp & Sony Alpha DSLR-A350. The full galleries are provided at Sigma fp Gallery & Sony A350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Sony A350
| fp | A350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2019 | June 2008 | More recent by 136 months | |
| Display dimension | 3.2" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 2100k | 230k | Clearer display (+1870k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Sigma fp
| A350 | fp | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Sigma fp and Sony A350
| fp | A350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Sigma fp vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Sigma fp enjoys physical measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") having a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs) whilst the Sony A350 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Sigma fp and Sony A350 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the fp and the A350.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the fp and A350 is 84 and 62 respectively.
Sigma fp vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements merely by seeing specs. The visual below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the fp and A350.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The fp having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Sigma fp will show greater detail because of its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos much more aggressively. The newer fp provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Sigma fp vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Sigma fp vs Sony A350 Specifications
| Sigma fp | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sigma | Sony |
| Model | Sigma fp | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
| Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2019-07-11 | 2008-06-06 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 35.9 x 23.9mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 858.0mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 25MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 102400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 6 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 49 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Leica L | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Amount of lenses | 30 | 143 |
| Crop factor | 1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3.2" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 2,100 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 12.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 422 grams (0.93 pounds) | 674 grams (1.49 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 65 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 595 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | BP-51 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 wec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $2,050 | $600 |