Sigma fp vs Sony T900
84 Imaging
75 Features
79 Overall
76


96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Sigma fp vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 102400)
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Announced July 2019
- Refreshed by Sigma fp L
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed February 2009

Sigma fp vs Sony T900 Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Sigma fp and Sony T900, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Sigma and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the fp (25MP) and T900 (12MP) and the fp (Full frame) and T900 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.

The fp was manufactured 10 years after the T900 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Sigma fp being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the fp grades versus the T900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sigma fp vs Sony T900 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Sigma fp & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are viewable at Sigma fp Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Sony T900
fp | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2019 | ![]() | February 2009 | Newer by 127 months |
Screen resolution | 2100k | ![]() | 922k | Clearer screen (+1178k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Sigma fp
T900 | fp | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 3.2" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Sigma fp and Sony T900
fp | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Sigma fp vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Sigma fp enjoys outer dimensions of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") and a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs) while the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check the Sigma fp and Sony T900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the fp compared to the T900.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the fp and T900 is 84 and 96 respectively.

Sigma fp vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading specs. The pic here should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the fp and T900.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The fp featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Sigma fp will offer more detail due to its extra 13MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent fp will have an advantage in sensor technology.

Sigma fp vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma fp vs Sony T900 Specifications
Sigma fp | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Sigma | Sony |
Model type | Sigma fp | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2019-07-11 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 35.9 x 23.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 858.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 25 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 102400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 6 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica L | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
Available lenses | 30 | - |
Crop factor | 1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.2 inches | 3.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 2,100k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 12.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | No | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 422 grams (0.93 lb) | 143 grams (0.32 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | BP-51 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 wec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $2,050 | $300 |