Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A200
78 Imaging
70 Features
59 Overall
65
66 Imaging
48 Features
38 Overall
44
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Announced July 2008
- Renewed by Sony A230
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A200 Overview
Following is a extensive comparison of the Sigma Quattro H versus Sony A200, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the Quattro H (45MP) and A200 (10MP) and the Quattro H (APS-H) and A200 (APS-C) offer different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe Quattro H was announced 7 years after the A200 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the Quattro H matches up against the A200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Sigma sd Quattro H & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The whole galleries are available at Sigma Quattro H Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Sony A200
| Quattro H | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 | July 2008 | More modern by 93 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1620k | 230k | Clearer display (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Sigma Quattro H
| A200 | Quattro H |
|---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro H and Sony A200
| Quattro H | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Sigma Quattro H features external dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sony A200 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
See the Sigma Quattro H versus Sony A200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the Quattro H compared to the A200.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Quattro H and A200 is 78 and 66 respectively.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at a spec sheet. The picture underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Quattro H and A200.
As you can see, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Quattro H using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Sigma Quattro H will give you more detail with its extra 35MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The more modern Quattro H should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Sigma sd Quattro H | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Sigma | Sony |
| Model type | Sigma sd Quattro H | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2016-02-23 | 2008-07-17 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Dual TRUE III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-H | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 26.6 x 17.9mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 476.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 45 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 6200 x 4152 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Sigma SA | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Number of lenses | 76 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,620k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.8 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Highest video resolution | - | None |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 572 gr (1.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | BP-61 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $1,134 | $100 |