Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A350
78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
62 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Launched June 2008
- Newer Model is Sony A380
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A350 Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Sigma Quattro H versus Sony A350, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Sigma and Sony. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the Quattro H (45MP) and A350 (14MP) and the Quattro H (APS-H) and A350 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Quattro H was released 7 years later than the A350 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Quattro H grades versus the A350 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A350 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Sigma sd Quattro H and Sony Alpha DSLR-A350. The complete galleries are viewable at Sigma Quattro H Gallery and Sony A350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Sony A350
| Quattro H | A350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2016 | June 2008 | Fresher by 94 months | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1620k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Sigma Quattro H
| A350 | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Sigma Quattro H and Sony A350
| Quattro H | A350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Sigma Quattro H comes with outer measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Sony A350 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") having a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).
Check the Sigma Quattro H versus Sony A350 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the Quattro H compared to the A350.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro H and A350 is 78 and 62 respectively.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing simply by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Quattro H and A350.
As you can see, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Quattro H featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Sigma Quattro H will produce extra detail as a result of its extra 31MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more recent Quattro H will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A350 Specifications
| Sigma sd Quattro H | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Sigma | Sony |
| Model | Sigma sd Quattro H | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
| Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2016-02-23 | 2008-06-06 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Dual TRUE III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-H | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 26.6 x 17.9mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 476.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 45 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 6200 x 4152 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Sigma SA | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Available lenses | 76 | 143 |
| Crop factor | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 1,620k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.8fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Max video resolution | - | None |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 674 grams (1.49 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 65 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 595 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | BP-61 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $1,134 | $600 |