Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A6300
78 Imaging
73 Features
59 Overall
67
83 Imaging
67 Features
82 Overall
73
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Older Model is Sony A6000
- Later Model is Sony A6500
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A6300 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Sigma Quattro H and Sony A6300, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by brands Sigma and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the Quattro H (45MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the Quattro H (APS-H) and A6300 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Quattro H was unveiled within a month of the A6300 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the Quattro H scores versus the A6300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A6300 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Sigma sd Quattro H & Sony Alpha a6300. The full galleries are viewable at Sigma Quattro H Gallery & Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Sony A6300
| Quattro H | A6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1620k |  | 922k | Clearer screen (+698k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Sigma Quattro H
| A6300 | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Sigma Quattro H and Sony A6300
| Quattro H | A6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2016 |  | February 2016 | Similar age |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Sigma Quattro H has got external measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Sony A6300 has specifications of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Examine the Sigma Quattro H and Sony A6300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the Quattro H and the A6300.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Quattro H and A6300 is 78 and 83 respectively.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing only by reviewing specifications. The graphic here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Quattro H and A6300.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Quattro H with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sigma Quattro H will deliver extra detail having an extra 21MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A6300 Specifications
| Sigma sd Quattro H | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Sigma | Sony |
| Model type | Sigma sd Quattro H | Sony Alpha a6300 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2016-02-23 | 2016-02-03 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Dual TRUE III | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-H | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 26.6 x 17.9mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 476.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 45MP | 24MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 6200 x 4152 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 425 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Sigma SA | Sony E |
| Total lenses | 76 | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,620k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 2,359k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.8 frames per sec | 11.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
| Maximum video resolution | - | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 404 grams (0.89 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 85 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1437 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BP-61 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $1,134 | $889 |
