Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A6300
78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
83 Imaging
66 Features
82 Overall
72
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Revealed February 2016
- Older Model is Sony A6000
- Later Model is Sony A6500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A6300 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Sigma Quattro H and Sony A6300, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by brands Sigma and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the Quattro H (45MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the Quattro H (APS-H) and A6300 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe Quattro H was unveiled within a month of the A6300 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the Quattro H scores versus the A6300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A6300 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Sigma sd Quattro H & Sony Alpha a6300. The full galleries are viewable at Sigma Quattro H Gallery & Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Sony A6300
| Quattro H | A6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1620k |  | 922k | Clearer screen (+698k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Sigma Quattro H
| A6300 | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Sigma Quattro H and Sony A6300
| Quattro H | A6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2016 |  | February 2016 | Similar age |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Sigma Quattro H has got external measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Sony A6300 has specifications of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Examine the Sigma Quattro H and Sony A6300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the Quattro H and the A6300.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Quattro H and A6300 is 78 and 83 respectively.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing only by reviewing specifications. The graphic here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Quattro H and A6300.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Quattro H with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sigma Quattro H will deliver extra detail having an extra 21MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony A6300 Specifications
| Sigma sd Quattro H | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Sigma | Sony |
| Model type | Sigma sd Quattro H | Sony Alpha a6300 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2016-02-23 | 2016-02-03 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Dual TRUE III | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-H | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 26.6 x 17.9mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 476.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 45MP | 24MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 6200 x 4152 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 425 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Sigma SA | Sony E |
| Total lenses | 76 | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,620k dot | 922k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 2,359k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.8 frames per sec | 11.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
| Maximum video resolution | - | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 404 grams (0.89 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 85 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1437 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BP-61 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | With downloadable app | |
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $1,134 | $889 |