Sigma Quattro H vs Sony RX100 II
78 Imaging
73 Features
59 Overall
67
89 Imaging
51 Features
74 Overall
60
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony RX100 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 281g - 102 x 58 x 38mm
- Announced June 2013
- Older Model is Sony RX100
- New Model is Sony RX100 III
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony RX100 II Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the Sigma Quattro H and Sony RX100 II, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Quattro H (45MP) and RX100 II (20MP) and the Quattro H (APS-H) and RX100 II (1") use totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Quattro H was launched 2 years later than the RX100 II and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX100 II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the Quattro H grades versus the RX100 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony RX100 II Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sigma sd Quattro H & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II. The complete galleries are available at Sigma Quattro H Gallery & Sony RX100 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Sony RX100 II
Quattro H | RX100 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | June 2013 | Fresher by 33 months | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 1229k | Crisper display (+391k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 II over the Sigma Quattro H
RX100 II | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Sigma Quattro H and Sony RX100 II
Quattro H | RX100 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony RX100 II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Sigma Quattro H offers physical measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Sony RX100 II has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 38mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 281 grams (0.62 lbs).
Contrast the Sigma Quattro H and Sony RX100 II in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the Quattro H vs the RX100 II.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro H and RX100 II is 78 and 89 respectively.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony RX100 II Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing only by going over specs. The photograph here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Quattro H and RX100 II.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Quattro H because of its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Sigma Quattro H will offer extra detail utilizing its extra 25 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The newer Quattro H is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony RX100 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony RX100 II Specifications
Sigma sd Quattro H | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sigma | Sony |
Model type | Sigma sd Quattro H | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 II |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2016-02-23 | 2013-06-27 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Dual TRUE III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-H | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 26.6 x 17.9mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 476.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 45 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6200 x 4152 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 160 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 76 | - |
Crop factor | 1.4 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,620k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | Xtra Fine WhiteMagic TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.8 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 15.00 m (ISO Auto (W)) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 281 grams (0.62 pounds) |
Dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 102 x 58 x 38mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 67 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 483 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP-61 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec. / 2 sec. / Self-portrait One-person/ Self-portrait Two-person/ Self timer Continuous (3 or 5 shots)) |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $1,134 | $598 |