Clicky

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W220

Portability
78
Imaging
73
Features
59
Overall
67
Sigma sd Quattro H front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
17
Overall
27

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W220 Key Specs

Sigma Quattro H
(Full Review)
  • 45MP - APS-H Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Announced February 2016
Sony W220
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
  • 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W220 Overview

Below is a complete review of the Sigma Quattro H versus Sony W220, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the Quattro H (45MP) and W220 (12MP) and the Quattro H (APS-H) and W220 (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Quattro H was introduced 7 years later than the W220 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W220 being a Compact camera.

Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the Quattro H matches up against the W220 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Sony W220

 Quattro H W220 
IntroducedFebruary 2016January 2009More recent by 87 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1620k230kSharper screen (+1390k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Sigma Quattro H

 W220 Quattro H 

Common features in the Sigma Quattro H and Sony W220

 Quattro H W220 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to lug around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Sigma Quattro H provides outside measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sony W220 has dimensions of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).

Examine the Sigma Quattro H versus Sony W220 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the Quattro H against the W220.

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W220 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Quattro H and W220 is 78 and 95 respectively.

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W220 top view buttons comparison

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements merely by going through a spec sheet. The graphic here may give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Quattro H and W220.

As you can see, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Quattro H with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Sigma Quattro H will provide extra detail using its extra 33MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The younger Quattro H should have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W220 sensor size comparison

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma Quattro H Portrait photography highlights
Sony W220 Portrait photography highlights
83
focusing manually
MP count excellent (45MP)
nice sensor size (APS-H)
offers face detection focusing
exports RAW files
27
has manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Sigma Quattro H Street photography advice
Sony W220 Street photography advice
70
nice sensor size (APS-H)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
57
image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sigma Quattro H as a Sports photography camera
Sony W220 as a Sports photography camera
72
MP count excellent (45 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-H)
offers tracking autofocus
environment sealing
comes with phase detect AF
very slow continuous shooting (3.8 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
25
image stabilization (Optical)
painfully slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Sigma Quattro H as a Travel photography camera
Sony W220 as a Travel photography camera
65
environment sealing
MP count excellent (45MP)
lack of Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
51
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
low megapixels (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (30mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Sigma Quattro H
Landscape photography with Sony W220
75
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
MP count excellent (45 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-H)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
does not have image stabilization
lack of Timelapse recording
32
has manual focus
image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (30mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma Quattro H as a Vlogging camera
Sony W220 as a Vlogging camera
26
offers face detection focusing
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low ( pixels)
lack of external microphone support
25
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (30mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W220 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma Quattro H and Sony W220
 Sigma sd Quattro HSony Cyber-shot DSC-W220
General Information
Make Sigma Sony
Model type Sigma sd Quattro H Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2016-02-23 2009-01-08
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip Dual TRUE III -
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CCD
Sensor size APS-H 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 26.6 x 17.9mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 476.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 45 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 6200 x 4152 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens support Sigma SA fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 30-120mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8-7.1
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Amount of lenses 76 -
Focal length multiplier 1.4 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 1,620 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.73x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 seconds 1 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.8fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 7.10 m (Auto ISO)
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps)
Max video resolution - 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight - 147 gr (0.32 lb)
Physical dimensions 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID BP-61 -
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $1,134 $160