Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W380
78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W380 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.9) lens
- 117g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W380 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W380, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Sigma and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the Quattro H (45MP) and W380 (14MP) and the Quattro H (APS-H) and W380 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Quattro H was revealed 6 years later than the W380 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W380 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the Quattro H grades vs the W380 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W380 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Sigma sd Quattro H & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380. The full galleries are provided at Sigma Quattro H Gallery & Sony W380 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Sony W380
| Quattro H | W380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2016 | January 2010 | Fresher by 75 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1620k | 230k | Clearer screen (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W380 over the Sigma Quattro H
| W380 | Quattro H |
|---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro H and Sony W380
| Quattro H | W380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W380 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Sigma Quattro H features outer measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sony W380 has sizing of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") having a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W380 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the Quattro H against the W380.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro H and W380 is 78 and 96 respectively.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W380 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to see the gap in sensor sizing just by going through specs. The photograph here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Quattro H and W380.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Quattro H using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Sigma Quattro H will show more detail because of its extra 31MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The fresher Quattro H will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W380 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W380 Specifications
| Sigma sd Quattro H | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sigma | Sony |
| Model | Sigma sd Quattro H | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2016-02-23 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Dual TRUE III | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-H | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 26.6 x 17.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 476.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 45MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 6200 x 4152 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.4-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Total lenses | 76 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.4 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,620k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 2 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.8 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 117 gr (0.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | BP-61 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/portrait2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $1,134 | $44 |