Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W380
78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
96 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W380 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.9) lens
- 117g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W380 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W380, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Sigma and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the Quattro H (45MP) and W380 (14MP) and the Quattro H (APS-H) and W380 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Quattro H was revealed 6 years later than the W380 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W380 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the Quattro H grades vs the W380 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W380 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Sigma sd Quattro H & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380. The full galleries are provided at Sigma Quattro H Gallery & Sony W380 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Sony W380
| Quattro H | W380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2016 | January 2010 | Fresher by 75 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1620k | 230k | Clearer screen (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W380 over the Sigma Quattro H
| W380 | Quattro H |
|---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro H and Sony W380
| Quattro H | W380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W380 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Sigma Quattro H features outer measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Sony W380 has sizing of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") having a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W380 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the Quattro H against the W380.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro H and W380 is 78 and 96 respectively.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W380 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to see the gap in sensor sizing just by going through specs. The photograph here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Quattro H and W380.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Quattro H using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Sigma Quattro H will show more detail because of its extra 31MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The fresher Quattro H will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W380 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Sigma Quattro H vs Sony W380 Specifications
| Sigma sd Quattro H | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sigma | Sony |
| Model | Sigma sd Quattro H | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W380 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2016-02-23 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Dual TRUE III | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-H | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 26.6 x 17.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 476.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 45MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 6200 x 4152 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.4-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Total lenses | 76 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.4 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,620k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 2 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.8 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.80 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 117 gr (0.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | BP-61 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/portrait2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $1,134 | $44 |