Sigma Quattro vs Sony A9 II
63 Imaging
68 Features
56 Overall
63
62 Imaging
74 Features
93 Overall
81
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A9 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Bump to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 678g - 129 x 96 x 76mm
- Announced October 2019
- Succeeded the Sony A9
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Sigma Quattro vs Sony A9 II Overview
In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Sigma Quattro and Sony A9 II, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by companies Sigma and Sony. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and A9 II (24MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and A9 II (Full frame) feature totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Quattro was unveiled 4 years before the A9 II which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A9 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a quick summation of how the Quattro scores vs the A9 II with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Sigma Quattro vs Sony A9 II Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Sigma sd Quattro and Sony Alpha A9 Mark II. The full galleries are viewable at Sigma Quattro Gallery and Sony A9 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony A9 II
| Quattro | A9 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1620k | 1440k | Sharper screen (+180k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A9 II over the Sigma Quattro
| A9 II | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | October 2019 | February 2016 | Newer by 43 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony A9 II
| Quattro | A9 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A9 II Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Sigma Quattro has external measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony A9 II has specifications of 129mm x 96mm x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 678 grams (1.49 lbs).
Compare the Sigma Quattro and Sony A9 II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the Quattro and the A9 II.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Quattro and A9 II is 63 and 62 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A9 II Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading through technical specs. The image underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Quattro and A9 II.
As you have seen, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Quattro having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sigma Quattro will resolve greater detail having an extra 5MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged Quattro is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A9 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A9 II Specifications
| Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Sigma | Sony |
| Model | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Alpha A9 Mark II |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2016-02-23 | 2019-10-03 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Dual TRUE III | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
| Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 847.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 29MP | 24MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 51200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 204800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 693 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Sigma SA | Sony E |
| Available lenses | 76 | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,620 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 3,686 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | 0.78x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.8 frames/s | 20.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | - | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 625 gr (1.38 lbs) | 678 gr (1.49 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 129 x 96 x 76mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 690 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP-61 | NP-FZ100 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous, 3 or 5 frames) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
| Storage slots | 1 | Two |
| Launch pricing | $738 | $4,498 |