Sigma Quattro vs Sony A300
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Introduced January 2008
- Replacement is Sony A330
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Sigma Quattro vs Sony A300 Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the Sigma Quattro versus Sony A300, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and A300 (10MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor size (APS-C).
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Quattro was manufactured 8 years after the A300 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the Quattro grades vs the A300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Sigma Quattro vs Sony A300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Sigma sd Quattro & Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The entire galleries are viewable at Sigma Quattro Gallery & Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony A300
| Quattro | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | January 2008 | Newer by 99 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 1620k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Sigma Quattro
| A300 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony A300
| Quattro | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Sigma Quattro has got outside measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Check the Sigma Quattro versus Sony A300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the Quattro compared to the A300.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro and A300 is 63 and 64 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions only by going over specifications. The pic below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Quattro and A300.
Plainly, both cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Sigma Quattro to offer extra detail due to its extra 19MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent Quattro will have an edge in sensor tech.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A300 Specifications
| Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Sigma | Sony |
| Model type | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2016-02-23 | 2008-01-30 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Dual TRUE III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 29 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Sigma SA | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Amount of lenses | 76 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 1,620k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.8fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Highest video resolution | - | None |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 625 gr (1.38 lbs) | 632 gr (1.39 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | BP-61 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $738 | $0 |