Sigma Quattro vs Sony A330
63 Imaging
68 Features
56 Overall
63
67 Imaging
49 Features
50 Overall
49
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 529g - 128 x 97 x 71mm
- Released May 2009
- Superseded the Sony A300
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Sigma Quattro vs Sony A330 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Sigma Quattro and Sony A330, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Sigma and Sony. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and A330 (10MP) but they possess the exact same sensor measurements (APS-C).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Quattro was revealed 6 years after the A330 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A330 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summary of how the Quattro grades against the A330 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Sigma Quattro vs Sony A330 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Sigma sd Quattro and Sony Alpha DSLR-A330. The full galleries are provided at Sigma Quattro Gallery and Sony A330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony A330
| Quattro | A330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 | May 2009 | Newer by 83 months | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1620k | 230k | Crisper display (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A330 over the Sigma Quattro
| A330 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony A330
| Quattro | A330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A330 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Sigma Quattro provides outer measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony A330 has dimensions of 128mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") and a weight of 529 grams (1.17 lbs).
Examine the Sigma Quattro and Sony A330 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the Quattro and the A330.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Quattro and A330 is 63 and 67 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A330 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions just by researching a spec sheet. The picture here should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Quattro and A330.
As you can see, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should expect to see the Sigma Quattro to result in extra detail because of its extra 19MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The younger Quattro should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A330 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A330 Specifications
| Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sigma | Sony |
| Model | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2016-02-23 | 2009-05-18 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Dual TRUE III | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 29 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Sigma SA | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Number of lenses | 76 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 1,620 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.8 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Highest video resolution | - | None |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 625 gr (1.38 lb) | 529 gr (1.17 lb) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 128 x 97 x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 535 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 230 pictures |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP-61 | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $738 | $545 |