Clicky

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A350

Portability
63
Imaging
68
Features
56
Overall
63
Sigma sd Quattro front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front
Portability
62
Imaging
52
Features
47
Overall
50

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A350 Key Specs

Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Announced February 2016
Sony A350
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Introduced June 2008
  • Successor is Sony A380
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A350 Overview

In this article, we are matching up the Sigma Quattro versus Sony A350, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Sigma and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and A350 (14MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (APS-C).

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The Quattro was manufactured 7 years later than the A350 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the Quattro scores versus the A350 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony A350

 Quattro A350 
IntroducedFebruary 2016June 2008More recent by 94 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1620k230kCrisper display (+1390k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Sigma Quattro

 A350 Quattro 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony A350

 Quattro A350 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Sigma Quattro enjoys exterior measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony A350 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") and a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).

Check out the Sigma Quattro versus Sony A350 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the Quattro compared to the A350.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A350 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro and A350 is 63 and 62 respectively.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements merely by checking out specs. The photograph here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Quattro and A350.

All in all, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Sigma Quattro to show more detail due to its extra 15 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent Quattro provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma Quattro Portrait photography info
Sony A350 Portrait photography info
80
has manual focus
high megapixels (29MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
71
manual focus
good MP (14MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Sigma Quattro Street photography details
Sony A350 Street photography details
59
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
environment sealing
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than average in class (625g)
66
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW files
more heavy than others (674 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sigma Quattro Sports photography advice
Sony A350 Sports photography advice
69
high megapixels (29 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has tracking autofocus
environment sealing
sensor has phase detect AF
low frames per second (3.8 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good MP (14MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect AF
slow frames per second (3.0 fps)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Sigma Quattro Travel photography features
Sony A350 Travel photography features
54
environment sealing
high megapixels (29MP)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than average in class (625g)
display isn't selfie friendly
51
good MP (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than others (674 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Sigma Quattro
Landscape photography with Sony A350
72
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
high megapixels (29 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
environment sealing
does not have image stabilization
no Timelapse function
64
manual focus
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good MP (14 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
missing Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Sigma Quattro
Vlogging with Sony A350
22
has face detection focusing
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low ( pixels)
no external microphone jack
more heavy than average in class (625 grams)
9
can't record video
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma Quattro and Sony A350
 Sigma sd QuattroSony Alpha DSLR-A350
General Information
Manufacturer Sigma Sony
Model Sigma sd Quattro Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
Class Advanced Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2016-02-23 2008-06-06
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Dual TRUE III -
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CCD
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.6mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 366.6mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 29 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5424 x 3616 4592 x 3056
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount Sigma SA Sony/Minolta Alpha
Total lenses 76 143
Crop factor 1.5 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 1,620k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.73x 0.49x
Features
Min shutter speed 30 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 3.8 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Maximum video resolution - None
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 625 grams (1.38 lbs) 674 grams (1.49 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 65
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 595
Other
Battery model BP-61 -
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $738 $600