Sigma Quattro vs Sony A350
63 Imaging
68 Features
56 Overall
63
62 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Introduced June 2008
- Successor is Sony A380
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Sigma Quattro vs Sony A350 Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Sigma Quattro versus Sony A350, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Sigma and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and A350 (14MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (APS-C).
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Quattro was manufactured 7 years later than the A350 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the Quattro scores versus the A350 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Sigma Quattro vs Sony A350 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Sigma sd Quattro & Sony Alpha DSLR-A350. The entire galleries are provided at Sigma Quattro Gallery & Sony A350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony A350
| Quattro | A350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 | June 2008 | More recent by 94 months | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1620k | 230k | Crisper display (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Sigma Quattro
| A350 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony A350
| Quattro | A350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Sigma Quattro enjoys exterior measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony A350 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") and a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).
Check out the Sigma Quattro versus Sony A350 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the Quattro compared to the A350.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro and A350 is 63 and 62 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements merely by checking out specs. The photograph here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Quattro and A350.
All in all, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Sigma Quattro to show more detail due to its extra 15 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent Quattro provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A350 Specifications
| Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sigma | Sony |
| Model | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2016-02-23 | 2008-06-06 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Dual TRUE III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 29 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Sigma SA | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Total lenses | 76 | 143 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,620k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.8 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Maximum video resolution | - | None |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 625 grams (1.38 lbs) | 674 grams (1.49 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 65 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 595 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | BP-61 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $738 | $600 |