Sigma Quattro vs Sony A900
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Announced October 2008
- Newer Model is Sony A99
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A900 Overview
Lets look closer at the Sigma Quattro versus Sony A900, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Sigma and Sony. The sensor resolution of the Quattro (29MP) and the A900 (25MP) is fairly comparable but the Quattro (APS-C) and A900 (Full frame) offer different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Quattro was revealed 7 years later than the A900 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise summation of how the Quattro scores against the A900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A900 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sigma sd Quattro & Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The full galleries are available at Sigma Quattro Gallery & Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony A900
Quattro | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | October 2008 | More recent by 90 months | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 922k | Sharper display (+698k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Sigma Quattro
A900 | Quattro |
---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony A900
Quattro | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Sigma Quattro has exterior dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony A900 has measurements of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Contrast the Sigma Quattro versus Sony A900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the Quattro vs the A900.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Quattro and A900 is 63 and 54 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by going through specs. The visual below will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Quattro and A900.
All in all, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Quattro using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sigma Quattro will provide more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The more modern Quattro should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A900 Specifications
Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sigma | Sony |
Model type | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2016-02-23 | 2008-10-22 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Dual TRUE III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 29 megapixels | 25 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 6048 x 4032 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Sigma SA | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Amount of lenses | 76 | 143 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,620k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.8 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Maximum video resolution | - | None |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 625 grams (1.38 pounds) | 895 grams (1.97 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 880 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP-61 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
Card slots | Single | 2 |
Cost at launch | $738 | $2,736 |