Clicky

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A900

Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63
Sigma sd Quattro front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 front
Portability
54
Imaging
66
Features
62
Overall
64

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A900 Key Specs

Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Announced February 2016
Sony A900
(Full Review)
  • 25MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
  • Announced October 2008
  • Newer Model is Sony A99
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A900 Overview

Lets look closer at the Sigma Quattro versus Sony A900, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Sigma and Sony. The sensor resolution of the Quattro (29MP) and the A900 (25MP) is fairly comparable but the Quattro (APS-C) and A900 (Full frame) offer different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Quattro was revealed 7 years later than the A900 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise summation of how the Quattro scores against the A900 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony A900

 Quattro A900 
AnnouncedFebruary 2016October 2008More recent by 90 months
Display resolution1620k922kSharper display (+698k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Sigma Quattro

 A900 Quattro 

Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony A900

 Quattro A900 
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Sigma Quattro has exterior dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony A900 has measurements of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).

Contrast the Sigma Quattro versus Sony A900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the Quattro vs the A900.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A900 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Quattro and A900 is 63 and 54 respectively.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A900 top view buttons comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison

Often, its difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by going through specs. The visual below will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Quattro and A900.

All in all, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Quattro using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sigma Quattro will provide more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The more modern Quattro should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A900 sensor size comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma Quattro Portrait photography details
Sony A900 Portrait photography details
81
focusing manually
great resolution (29MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
71
has manual focus
excellent MP (25 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Sigma Quattro
Street photography with Sony A900
59
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
environment proofing
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than competition (625g)
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
large sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
weather proofing
screen does not articulate
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sigma Quattro Sports photography advice
Sony A900 Sports photography advice
70
great resolution (29 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports tracking focus
environment proofing
supports phase detect autofocus
max frames per second very slow (3.8 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
70
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
excellent MP (25 megapixels)
large sensor size (Full frame)
weather proofing
supports phase detect autofocus
no liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Sigma Quattro Travel photography info
Sony A900 Travel photography info
55
environment proofing
great resolution (29MP)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition (625g)
display is not selfie friendly
54
weather proofing
excellent MP (25 megapixels)
does not have Timelapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Sigma Quattro Landscape photography details
Sony A900 Landscape photography details
72
focusing manually
switch lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
great resolution (29MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
environment proofing
does not have image stabilization
no Timelapse mode
72
has manual focus
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
excellent MP (25MP)
large sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
weather proofing
two card slots
no liveview
does not have Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Sigma Quattro
Vlogging with Sony A900
22
supports face detect autofocus
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video ( pixels)
no microphone support
more heavy than competition (625 grams)
9
lack of video recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma Quattro and Sony A900
 Sigma sd QuattroSony Alpha DSLR-A900
General Information
Company Sigma Sony
Model type Sigma sd Quattro Sony Alpha DSLR-A900
Category Advanced Mirrorless Advanced DSLR
Announced 2016-02-23 2008-10-22
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Chip Dual TRUE III Bionz
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Full frame
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.6mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor surface area 366.6mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 29 megapixels 25 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5424 x 3616 6048 x 4032
Maximum native ISO 6400 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens support Sigma SA Sony/Minolta Alpha
Amount of lenses 76 143
Crop factor 1.5 1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,620k dots 922k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - TFT Xtra Fine color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.73x 0.74x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/8000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.8 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash options no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Maximum video resolution - None
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 625 grams (1.38 pounds) 895 grams (1.97 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 79
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.7
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 1431
Other
Battery life - 880 photos
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID BP-61 NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Card slots Single 2
Cost at launch $738 $2,736