Clicky

Sigma Quattro vs Sony QX1

Portability
63
Imaging
68
Features
56
Overall
63
Sigma sd Quattro front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
62
Features
48
Overall
56

Sigma Quattro vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Announced February 2016
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Launched September 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sigma Quattro vs Sony QX1 Overview

Here, we will be comparing the Sigma Quattro versus Sony QX1, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Lens-style by brands Sigma and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and QX1 (20MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (APS-C).

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Quattro was manufactured 18 months after the QX1 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras feature different body design with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the Quattro grades versus the QX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony QX1

 Quattro QX1 
LaunchedFebruary 2016September 2014Newer by 18 months
Screen size3""Bigger screen (+3")
Screen resolution1620k0kSharper screen (+1620k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Sigma Quattro

 QX1 Quattro 
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony QX1

 Quattro QX1 
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Sigma Quattro vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Sigma Quattro offers physical measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony QX1 has specifications of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

Check the Sigma Quattro versus Sony QX1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the Quattro and the QX1.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Quattro and QX1 is 63 and 90 respectively.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by checking specifications. The image below might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Quattro and QX1.

Plainly, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should count on the Sigma Quattro to give you extra detail due to its extra 9MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The fresher Quattro will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma Quattro vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma Quattro Portrait photography information
Sony QX1 Portrait photography information
80
you can focus manually
excellent megapixels (29 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
has face detect focus
delivers RAW files
65
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detection focus
saves RAW formats
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Sigma Quattro Street photography advice
Sony QX1 Street photography advice
59
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
weather proofing
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than others (625g)
69
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
boasts focus via touch
no moving screen
no image stabilization
more heavy than average (216 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sigma Quattro Sports photography advice
Sony QX1 Sports photography advice
69
excellent megapixels (29 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
has tracking focus
weather proofing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.8 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
56
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
better than average battery (440 CIPA)
max frames per second very slow (4.0 fps)
no image stabilization
does not have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Sigma Quattro
Travel photography with Sony QX1
54
weather proofing
excellent megapixels (29 megapixels)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than others (625g)
does not have selfie friendly display
71
better than average battery (440 per charge)
boasts focus via touch
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than average (216 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Sigma Quattro Landscape photography information
Sony QX1 Landscape photography information
72
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen is a good size (3")
excellent megapixels (29MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
weather proofing
lack of image stabilization
no Timelapse function
63
you can focus manually
change lenses (Sony E mount)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
better than average battery (440 per charge)
tiny screen ( inch)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
lack of Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma Quattro Vlogging highlights
Sony QX1 Vlogging highlights
22
has face detect focus
does not have selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low ( resolution)
no microphone port
more heavy than others (625g)
32
touchscreen
provides face detection focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
lack of external microphone port
more heavy than average (216 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sigma Quattro vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma Quattro and Sony QX1
 Sigma sd QuattroSony Alpha QX1
General Information
Manufacturer Sigma Sony
Model type Sigma sd Quattro Sony Alpha QX1
Class Advanced Mirrorless Lens-style
Announced 2016-02-23 2014-09-03
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Lens-style
Sensor Information
Powered by Dual TRUE III Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.6mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor surface area 366.6mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 29MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 5424 x 3616 5456 x 3632
Maximum native ISO 6400 16000
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens support Sigma SA Sony E
Number of lenses 76 -
Crop factor 1.5 1.6
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" -
Screen resolution 1,620k dot 0k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.73x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.8fps 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings no built-in flash Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Maximum video resolution - 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 625g (1.38 lb) 216g (0.48 lb)
Physical dimensions 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 440 images
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID BP-61 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $738 $500