Sigma Quattro vs Sony A6300
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
83 Imaging
67 Features
82 Overall
73
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Introduced February 2016
- Superseded the Sony A6000
- Successor is Sony A6500
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Sigma Quattro vs Sony A6300 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Sigma Quattro versus Sony A6300, both Advanced Mirrorless cameras by rivals Sigma and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and A6300 (24MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizes (APS-C).
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Quattro was revealed at a similar time to the A6300 so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a simple view of how the Quattro grades vs the A6300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Sigma Quattro vs Sony A6300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Sigma sd Quattro & Sony Alpha a6300. The full galleries are viewable at Sigma Quattro Gallery & Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony A6300
| Quattro | A6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1620k |  | 922k | Crisper display (+698k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Sigma Quattro
| A6300 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony A6300
| Quattro | A6300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 |  | February 2016 | Same age |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Sigma Quattro enjoys outer measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony A6300 has specifications of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Contrast the Sigma Quattro versus Sony A6300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Quattro versus the A6300.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro and A6300 is 63 and 83 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes only by seeing a spec sheet. The pic here should give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the Quattro and A6300.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Sigma Quattro to produce greater detail because of its extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos much more aggressively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Sigma Quattro vs Sony A6300 Specifications
| Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Sigma | Sony |
| Model type | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Alpha a6300 |
| Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2016-02-23 | 2016-02-03 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Dual TRUE III | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 29MP | 24MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 425 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Sigma SA | Sony E |
| Available lenses | 76 | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,620k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,359k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.8 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
| Highest video resolution | - | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 625 grams (1.38 lbs) | 404 grams (0.89 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 85 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1437 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BP-61 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $738 | $889 |