Clicky

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A6400

Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63
Sigma sd Quattro front
 
Sony Alpha a6400 front
Portability
83
Imaging
69
Features
88
Overall
76

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A6400 Key Specs

Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Released February 2016
Sony A6400
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 32000 (Push to 102400)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
  • Released January 2019
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A6400 Overview

Following is a comprehensive comparison of the Sigma Quattro and Sony A6400, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Sigma and Sony. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and A6400 (24MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (APS-C).

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Quattro was launched 3 years earlier than the A6400 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the Quattro grades against the A6400 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony A6400

 Quattro A6400 
Screen resolution1620k922kClearer screen (+698k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A6400 over the Sigma Quattro

 A6400 Quattro 
ReleasedJanuary 2019February 2016More modern by 35 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony A6400

 Quattro A6400 
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A6400 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Sigma Quattro features exterior dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony A6400 has specifications of 120mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") and a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs).

Take a look at the Sigma Quattro and Sony A6400 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the Quattro against the A6400.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A6400 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Quattro and A6400 is 63 and 83 respectively.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A6400 top view buttons comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A6400 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes purely by going over specs. The pic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Quattro and A6400.

As you can plainly see, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Sigma Quattro to offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 5MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged Quattro is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A6400 sensor size comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A6400 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A6400 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma Quattro as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A6400 as a Portrait photography camera
81
you can focus manually
amazing megapixels (29MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
provides face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
81
manual focus
resolution is good (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
features face detection focus
saves RAW formats
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Sigma Quattro as a Street photography camera
Sony A6400 as a Street photography camera
59
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
environment sealing
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
heavier than average (625g)
81
has a tilting screen
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
provides touch focus
environment sealing
above average ISO range (32,000)
no image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Sigma Quattro
Sports photography with Sony A6400
70
amazing megapixels (29 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
provides tracking focus
environment sealing
sensor has phase detect autofocus
slow continuous shooting (3.8 fps)
does not have image stabilization
76
resolution is good (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
features tracking autofocus
environment sealing
comes with phase detect auto focus
no image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Sigma Quattro as a Travel photography camera
Sony A6400 as a Travel photography camera
55
environment sealing
amazing megapixels (29MP)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than average (625 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
87
environment sealing
connects via bluetooth
provides touch focus
resolution is good (24MP)
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Sigma Quattro Landscape photography highlights
Sony A6400 Landscape photography highlights
72
you can focus manually
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
amazing megapixels (29 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
environment sealing
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
80
manual focus
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
resolution is good (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
above average ISO range (32,000)
saves RAW formats
environment sealing
no image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma Quattro as a Vlogging camera
Sony A6400 as a Vlogging camera
22
provides face detect autofocus
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low ( pixels)
doesn't have mic support
heavier than average (625g)
80
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
features face detection focus
high res video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
does have external microphone socket
no image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sigma Quattro vs Sony A6400 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma Quattro and Sony A6400
 Sigma sd QuattroSony Alpha a6400
General Information
Make Sigma Sony
Model type Sigma sd Quattro Sony Alpha a6400
Type Advanced Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2016-02-23 2019-01-15
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Dual TRUE III Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CMOS
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.6mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 366.6mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 29 megapixels 24 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5424 x 3616 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 6400 32000
Highest boosted ISO - 102400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 9 425
Lens
Lens support Sigma SA Sony E
Number of lenses 76 121
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 3" 3"
Display resolution 1,620 thousand dots 922 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.73x 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.8 frames per second 11.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 6.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings no built-in flash Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution - 3840x2160
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 625 gr (1.38 lbs) 403 gr (0.89 lbs)
Physical dimensions 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 83
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 24.0
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 1431
Other
Battery life - 410 images
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID BP-61 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant)
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $738 $898