Sigma Quattro vs Sony H20
63 Imaging
68 Features
56 Overall
63


87 Imaging
33 Features
29 Overall
31
Sigma Quattro vs Sony H20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-380mm (F3.5-4.4) lens
- 250g - 107 x 69 x 47mm
- Announced May 2009

Sigma Quattro vs Sony H20 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Sigma Quattro versus Sony H20, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Sigma and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and H20 (10MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and H20 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.

The Quattro was announced 6 years later than the H20 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H20 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the Quattro grades vs the H20 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony H20 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Sigma sd Quattro & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20. The whole galleries are available at Sigma Quattro Gallery & Sony H20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony H20
Quattro | H20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | ![]() | May 2009 | Fresher by 83 months |
Display resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H20 over the Sigma Quattro
H20 | Quattro |
---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony H20
Quattro | H20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony H20 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Sigma Quattro comes with physical dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sony H20 has measurements of 107mm x 69mm x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Compare the Sigma Quattro versus Sony H20 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the Quattro versus the H20.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro and H20 is 63 and 87 respectively.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony H20 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizing purely by going through specifications. The photograph below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Quattro and H20.
To sum up, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Quattro using its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Sigma Quattro will produce more detail with its extra 19 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images way more aggressively. The more recent Quattro will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony H20 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony H20 Specifications
Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sigma | Sony |
Model | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2016-02-23 | 2009-05-14 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Dual TRUE III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 29MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 38-380mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 2cm |
Available lenses | 76 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,620 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.8fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.10 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 625g (1.38 lbs) | 250g (0.55 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 107 x 69 x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | BP-61 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $738 | $249 |