Sigma Quattro vs Sony H55
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63


92 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
Sigma Quattro vs Sony H55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 29mm
- Released June 2010

Sigma Quattro vs Sony H55 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Sigma Quattro and Sony H55, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and H55 (14MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and H55 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.

The Quattro was announced 5 years later than the H55 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H55 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Quattro scores against the H55 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony H55 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Sigma sd Quattro and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55. The whole galleries are available at Sigma Quattro Gallery and Sony H55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony H55
Quattro | H55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | ![]() | June 2010 | Fresher by 70 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H55 over the Sigma Quattro
H55 | Quattro |
---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony H55
Quattro | H55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony H55 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Sigma Quattro enjoys physical measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony H55 has specifications of 103mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Examine the Sigma Quattro and Sony H55 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the Quattro vs the H55.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro and H55 is 63 and 92 respectively.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony H55 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing just by looking at specifications. The visual below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Quattro and H55.
Plainly, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Quattro having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Sigma Quattro will resolve greater detail with its extra 15MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The newer Quattro should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony H55 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony H55 Specifications
Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sigma | Sony |
Model type | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2016-02-23 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Dual TRUE III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 29MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 76 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,620 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.8 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.80 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Slow Syncro, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 625g (1.38 pounds) | 200g (0.44 pounds) |
Dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 103 x 58 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | BP-61 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $738 | $235 |