Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX300
63 Imaging
68 Features
56 Overall
63
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Old Model is Sony HX200V
- Newer Model is Sony HX400V
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX300 Overview
Following is a comprehensive overview of the Sigma Quattro versus Sony HX300, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Sigma and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and HX300 (20MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and HX300 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Quattro was introduced 3 years after the HX300 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the Quattro scores against the HX300 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Sigma sd Quattro and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The whole galleries are provided at Sigma Quattro Gallery and Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony HX300
| Quattro | HX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 | February 2013 | More modern by 37 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1620k | 921k | Sharper screen (+699k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Sigma Quattro
| HX300 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony HX300
| Quattro | HX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Sigma Quattro enjoys outer measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has proportions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") along with a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Compare the Sigma Quattro versus Sony HX300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the Quattro and the HX300.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro and HX300 is 63 and 63 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through technical specs. The picture here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Quattro and HX300.
As you can tell, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Quattro having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Sigma Quattro will resolve greater detail using its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The newer Quattro provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX300 Specifications
| Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Sigma | Sony |
| Model type | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2016-02-23 | 2013-02-20 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Dual TRUE III | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 29MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Number of lenses | 76 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,620 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.8 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 625g (1.38 lb) | 623g (1.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | BP-61 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $738 | $339 |