Clicky

Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX300

Portability
63
Imaging
68
Features
56
Overall
63
Sigma sd Quattro front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front
Portability
63
Imaging
44
Features
51
Overall
46

Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX300 Key Specs

Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Launched February 2016
Sony HX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
  • Introduced February 2013
  • Old Model is Sony HX200V
  • Newer Model is Sony HX400V
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX300 Overview

Following is a comprehensive overview of the Sigma Quattro versus Sony HX300, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Sigma and Sony. There is a crucial difference between the image resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and HX300 (20MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and HX300 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Quattro was introduced 3 years after the HX300 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the Quattro scores against the HX300 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony HX300

 Quattro HX300 
IntroducedFebruary 2016February 2013More modern by 37 months
Screen resolution1620k921kSharper screen (+699k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Sigma Quattro

 HX300 Quattro 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony HX300

 Quattro HX300 
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen dimensions
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Sigma Quattro enjoys outer measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony HX300 has proportions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") along with a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).

Compare the Sigma Quattro versus Sony HX300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the Quattro and the HX300.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX300 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro and HX300 is 63 and 63 respectively.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through technical specs. The picture here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Quattro and HX300.

As you can tell, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Quattro having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Sigma Quattro will resolve greater detail using its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The newer Quattro provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma Quattro Portrait photography details
Sony HX300 Portrait photography details
80
you can focus manually
fantastic resolution (29 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
42
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Sigma Quattro as a Street photography camera
Sony HX300 as a Street photography camera
59
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
weather sealing
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
heavier than others (625 grams)
50
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Optical)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
heavier than competition (623g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Sigma Quattro
Sports photography with Sony HX300
69
fantastic resolution (29 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
offers tracking focus
weather sealing
sensor has phase detect autofocus
low frames per second (3.8 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
55
great zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Sigma Quattro as a Travel photography camera
Sony HX300 as a Travel photography camera
54
weather sealing
fantastic resolution (29MP)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than others (625g)
does not have selfie friendly display
54
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long reach (1200mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (623 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Sigma Quattro Landscape photography features
Sony HX300 Landscape photography features
72
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Sigma SA mount)
good sized screen (3")
fantastic resolution (29MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
weather sealing
lack of image stabilization
missing Time Lapse recording
48
focusing manually
rather wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma Quattro Vlogging features
Sony HX300 Vlogging features
22
offers face detect autofocus
does not have selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution ( resolution)
missing mic port
heavier than others (625 grams)
25
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing external mic jack
heavier than competition (623g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma Quattro and Sony HX300
 Sigma sd QuattroSony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
General Information
Manufacturer Sigma Sony
Model type Sigma sd Quattro Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2016-02-23 2013-02-20
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by Dual TRUE III -
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) BSI-CMOS
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.6mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 366.6mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 29MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 5424 x 3616 5184 x 3888
Maximum native ISO 6400 12800
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount type Sigma SA fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8-6.3
Number of lenses 76 -
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,620 thousand dot 921 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.73x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.8 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash -
Flash options no built-in flash -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Maximum video resolution - 1920x1080
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 625g (1.38 lb) 623g (1.37 lb)
Dimensions 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID BP-61 -
Self timer Yes -
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $738 $339