Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX5
63 Imaging
68 Features
56 Overall
63
92 Imaging
33 Features
30 Overall
31
Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Released February 2016
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released June 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX5 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Sigma Quattro and Sony HX5, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and HX5 (10MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and HX5 (1/2.4") provide totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Quattro was unveiled 5 years after the HX5 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX5 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Quattro scores vs the HX5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Sigma sd Quattro & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5. The full galleries are viewable at Sigma Quattro Gallery & Sony HX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony HX5
| Quattro | HX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2016 | June 2010 | Newer by 70 months | |
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Screen resolution | 1620k | 230k | Crisper screen (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony HX5 over the Sigma Quattro
| HX5 | Quattro |
|---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony HX5
| Quattro | HX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX5 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Sigma Quattro comes with exterior dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony HX5 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Check out the Sigma Quattro and Sony HX5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the Quattro and the HX5.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Quattro and HX5 is 63 and 92 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX5 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to see the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading a spec sheet. The pic below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Quattro and HX5.
Clearly, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Quattro with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Sigma Quattro will deliver more detail having an extra 19 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher Quattro will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Sigma Quattro vs Sony HX5 Specifications
| Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Sigma | Sony |
| Model type | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5 |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2016-02-23 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Dual TRUE III | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.4" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 27.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 29 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Number of lenses | 76 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 1,620 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.8 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.80 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 625 gr (1.38 pounds) | 200 gr (0.44 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | BP-61 | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/portrait2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, optional SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $738 | $275 |