Sigma Quattro vs Sony RX1
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
79 Imaging
69 Features
57 Overall
64
Sigma Quattro vs Sony RX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0-22.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Launched February 2013
Sigma Quattro vs Sony RX1 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Sigma Quattro and Sony RX1, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Sigma and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and RX1 (24MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and RX1 (Full frame) posses totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Quattro was released 3 years later than the RX1 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summary of how the Quattro grades against the RX1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony RX1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sigma sd Quattro & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1. The complete galleries are available at Sigma Quattro Gallery & Sony RX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony RX1
Quattro | RX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | February 2013 | Fresher by 37 months | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 1229k | Clearer display (+391k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1 over the Sigma Quattro
RX1 | Quattro |
---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony RX1
Quattro | RX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony RX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Sigma Quattro offers physical dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Sony RX1 has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") having a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Check the Sigma Quattro and Sony RX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the Quattro and the RX1.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Quattro and RX1 is 63 and 79 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony RX1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing just by reading a spec sheet. The visual underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Quattro and RX1.
Clearly, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Quattro because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Sigma Quattro will offer extra detail as a result of its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more modern Quattro will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony RX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma Quattro vs Sony RX1 Specifications
Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sigma | Sony |
Model | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2016-02-23 | 2013-02-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Dual TRUE III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 29 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-22.0 |
Total lenses | 76 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,620k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.8 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.00 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 625 grams (1.38 lb) | 482 grams (1.06 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 93 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 2534 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 270 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BP-61 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $738 | $2,798 |