Clicky

Sigma Quattro vs Sony S2000

Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63
Sigma sd Quattro front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 front
Portability
93
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Sigma Quattro vs Sony S2000 Key Specs

Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Revealed February 2016
Sony S2000
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
  • Released January 2010
Photography Glossary

Sigma Quattro vs Sony S2000 Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Sigma Quattro and Sony S2000, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Sigma and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and S2000 (10MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and S2000 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Quattro was manufactured 6 years later than the S2000 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.

Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the Quattro scores versus the S2000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony S2000

 Quattro S2000 
ReleasedFebruary 2016January 2010More recent by 75 months
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Screen resolution1620k230kSharper screen (+1390k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Sigma Quattro

 S2000 Quattro 

Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony S2000

 Quattro S2000 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch screen Neither includes Touch screen

Sigma Quattro vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Sigma Quattro features outside dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony S2000 has proportions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Compare the Sigma Quattro and Sony S2000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the Quattro compared to the S2000.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony S2000 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Quattro and S2000 is 63 and 93 respectively.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony S2000 top view buttons comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by seeing specifications. The photograph below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Quattro and S2000.

To sum up, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Quattro because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sigma Quattro will provide more detail due to its extra 19 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots way more aggressively. The fresher Quattro is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony S2000 sensor size comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma Quattro vs Sony S2000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma Quattro Portrait photography details
Sony S2000 Portrait photography details
81
manual focus
MP count amazing (29MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
includes face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
19
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Sigma Quattro Street photography information
Sony S2000 Street photography information
59
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
environment sealing
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than competition in class (625 grams)
46
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sigma Quattro Sports photography features
Sony S2000 Sports photography features
70
MP count amazing (29 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
includes tracking autofocus
environment sealing
sensor has phase detect autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (3.8 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,200 seconds)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Sigma Quattro
Travel photography with Sony S2000
55
environment sealing
MP count amazing (29MP)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (625g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
50
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
MP count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Sigma Quattro
Landscape photography with Sony S2000
72
manual focus
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
MP count amazing (29MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
environment sealing
does not have image stabilization
no Timelapse function
27
nice screen size (3")
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma Quattro Vlogging info
Sony S2000 Vlogging info
22
includes face detection autofocus
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low ( pixels)
no external microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (625g)
21
wide angle not great (33mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sigma Quattro vs Sony S2000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma Quattro and Sony S2000
 Sigma sd QuattroSony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
General Information
Manufacturer Sigma Sony
Model Sigma sd Quattro Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000
Class Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2016-02-23 2010-01-07
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Dual TRUE III Bionz
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 366.6mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 29 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5424 x 3616 3456 x 2592
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount Sigma SA fixed lens
Lens focal range - 33-105mm (3.2x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.1-5.6
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Available lenses 76 -
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3" 3"
Display resolution 1,620k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.73x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30s 1s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1200s
Continuous shooting rate 3.8 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.30 m
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution - 640x480
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 625 gr (1.38 pounds) 167 gr (0.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model BP-61 2 x AA
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $738 $225