Sigma Quattro vs Sony S2000
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Sigma Quattro vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2016
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Released January 2010
Sigma Quattro vs Sony S2000 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Sigma Quattro and Sony S2000, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Sigma and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and S2000 (10MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and S2000 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Quattro was manufactured 6 years later than the S2000 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the Quattro scores versus the S2000 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony S2000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Sigma sd Quattro and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The entire galleries are provided at Sigma Quattro Gallery and Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony S2000
Quattro | S2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | January 2010 | More recent by 75 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 1620k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Sigma Quattro
S2000 | Quattro |
---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony S2000
Quattro | S2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Sigma Quattro features outside dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony S2000 has proportions of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Sigma Quattro and Sony S2000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the Quattro compared to the S2000.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the Quattro and S2000 is 63 and 93 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by seeing specifications. The photograph below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Quattro and S2000.
To sum up, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Quattro because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sigma Quattro will provide more detail due to its extra 19 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots way more aggressively. The fresher Quattro is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma Quattro vs Sony S2000 Specifications
Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Sigma | Sony |
Model | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2016-02-23 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Dual TRUE III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 29 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 3456 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 76 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,620k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 1s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1200s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.8 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.30 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | - | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 625 gr (1.38 pounds) | 167 gr (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | BP-61 | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $738 | $225 |