Sigma Quattro vs Sony T110
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57da5/57da55bc092010e6c2734595d664451750b4424f" alt="Sigma sd Quattro front Sigma sd Quattro front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1d49/c1d49e749ba44c4dd9e605b25872fb3279b70f84" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 front"
96 Imaging
38 Features
30 Overall
34
Sigma Quattro vs Sony T110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Released February 2016
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-108mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 121g - 93 x 56 x 17mm
- Released January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sigma Quattro vs Sony T110 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Sigma Quattro versus Sony T110, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Sigma and Sony. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and T110 (16MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and T110 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The Quattro was unveiled 5 years later than the T110 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple overview of how the Quattro matches up vs the T110 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sigma Quattro vs Sony T110 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sigma sd Quattro and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110. The full galleries are available at Sigma Quattro Gallery and Sony T110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony T110
Quattro | T110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2016 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 63 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony T110 over the Sigma Quattro
T110 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony T110
Quattro | T110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony T110 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Sigma Quattro has got physical measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony T110 has proportions of 93mm x 56mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check out the Sigma Quattro versus Sony T110 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the Quattro compared to the T110.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d6b3/8d6b3f187d5cb906dcda73e1d8eefcd0871ca314" alt="Sigma Quattro vs Sony T110 size comparison Sigma Quattro vs Sony T110 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro and T110 is 63 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d6c8/5d6c8e29c4bc05533e11da1e756b0fb9456f1ba9" alt="Sigma Quattro vs Sony T110 top view buttons comparison Sigma Quattro vs Sony T110 top view buttons comparison"
Sigma Quattro vs Sony T110 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements only by looking through technical specs. The visual below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Quattro and T110.
As you have seen, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Quattro using its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Sigma Quattro will render more detail having an extra 13 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The more modern Quattro will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39924/39924f2ce54c690a0b91218d05de9e8f3c79dfb5" alt="Sigma Quattro vs Sony T110 sensor size comparison Sigma Quattro vs Sony T110 sensor size comparison"
Sigma Quattro vs Sony T110 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cef1/4cef17cfa4fa8db98460912e7fa51b259f9c1695" alt="Sigma Quattro vs Sony T110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Sigma Quattro vs Sony T110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sigma Quattro vs Sony T110 Specifications
Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Sigma | Sony |
Model type | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T110 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2016-02-23 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Dual TRUE III | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 29 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 76 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,620 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | Clear Photo LCD Plus with touchscreen interface |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.8fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 2.80 m |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 625g (1.38 lbs) | 121g (0.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 93 x 56 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | BP-61 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $738 | $199 |