Sigma Quattro vs Sony T900
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Sigma Quattro vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Released February 2016
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Launched February 2009
Sigma Quattro vs Sony T900 Overview
The following is a thorough review of the Sigma Quattro vs Sony T900, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and T900 (12MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and T900 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe Quattro was manufactured 7 years after the T900 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Quattro matches up against the T900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony T900 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Sigma sd Quattro & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are viewable at Sigma Quattro Gallery & Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony T900
Quattro | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | February 2009 | Newer by 86 months | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 922k | Sharper display (+698k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Sigma Quattro
T900 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony T900
Quattro | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Sigma Quattro comes with exterior dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Contrast the Sigma Quattro vs Sony T900 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the Quattro versus the T900.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Quattro and T900 is 63 and 96 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading through a spec sheet. The image underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Quattro and T900.
Clearly, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Quattro featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Sigma Quattro will give you extra detail due to its extra 17MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The newer Quattro is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma Quattro vs Sony T900 Specifications
Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Sigma | Sony |
Model | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2016-02-23 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Dual TRUE III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 29 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-10.0 |
Available lenses | 76 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
Resolution of display | 1,620k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 2s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.8fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 625g (1.38 lb) | 143g (0.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | BP-61 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $738 | $300 |