Clicky

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290

Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63
Sigma sd Quattro front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 front
Portability
94
Imaging
34
Features
28
Overall
31

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290 Key Specs

Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Released February 2016
Sony W290
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 57 x 23mm
  • Launched February 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290 Overview

The following is a thorough assessment of the Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and W290 (12MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and W290 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Quattro was manufactured 7 years after the W290 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W290 being a Compact camera.

Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the Quattro scores vs the W290 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony W290

 Quattro W290 
LaunchedFebruary 2016February 2009Newer by 86 months
Screen resolution1620k230kSharper screen (+1390k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony W290 over the Sigma Quattro

 W290 Quattro 

Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony W290

 Quattro W290 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurement
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither has Touch friendly screen

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to travel with your camera often, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Sigma Quattro has outside dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony W290 has measurements of 98mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Take a look at the Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the Quattro and the W290.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Quattro and W290 is 63 and 94 respectively.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290 top view buttons comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be tough to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions only by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Quattro and W290.

As you can see, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Quattro because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Sigma Quattro will show extra detail due to its extra 17 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more modern Quattro is going to have an edge in sensor tech.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290 sensor size comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma Quattro as a Portrait photography camera
Sony W290 as a Portrait photography camera
81
you can focus manually
amazing resolution (29MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
27
manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Sigma Quattro Street photography factors
Sony W290 Street photography factors
59
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
weather proof
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than competition (625g)
56
has image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sigma Quattro as a Sports photography camera
Sony W290 as a Sports photography camera
70
amazing resolution (29 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
includes tracking focus
weather proof
comes with phase detect AF
continuous shooting slow (3.8 fps)
does not have image stabilization
25
has image stabilization (Optical)
slow frames per second (2.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Sigma Quattro Travel photography features
Sony W290 Travel photography features
55
weather proof
amazing resolution (29 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition (625g)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
57
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Sigma Quattro
Landscape photography with Sony W290
72
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
amazing resolution (29MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
weather proof
does not have image stabilization
lack of Timelapse recording
41
manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
manual exposure not available
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma Quattro Vlogging advice
Sony W290 Vlogging advice
22
includes face detect focusing
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low res video ( resolution)
lack of microphone port
more heavy than competition (625 grams)
28
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma Quattro and Sony W290
 Sigma sd QuattroSony Cyber-shot DSC-W290
General Information
Brand Sigma Sony
Model Sigma sd Quattro Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290
Type Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2016-02-23 2009-02-17
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Dual TRUE III -
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 366.6mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 29MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5424 x 3616 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount Sigma SA fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.3-5.2
Macro focus distance - 10cm
Number of lenses 76 -
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Resolution of display 1,620k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.73x -
Features
Min shutter speed 30 seconds 2 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.8 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.90 m
Flash options no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution - 1280x720
Video data format - MPEG-4
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 625 gr (1.38 lbs) 167 gr (0.37 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") 98 x 57 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model BP-61 -
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $738 $230