Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
94 Imaging
34 Features
28 Overall
31
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Released February 2016
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 98 x 57 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290 Overview
The following is a thorough assessment of the Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Sigma and Sony. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and W290 (12MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and W290 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Quattro was manufactured 7 years after the W290 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W290 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the Quattro scores vs the W290 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Sigma sd Quattro & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290. The entire galleries are available at Sigma Quattro Gallery & Sony W290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony W290
Quattro | W290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | February 2009 | Newer by 86 months | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1390k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W290 over the Sigma Quattro
W290 | Quattro |
---|
Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony W290
Quattro | W290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera often, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Sigma Quattro has outside dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Sony W290 has measurements of 98mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the Quattro and the W290.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Quattro and W290 is 63 and 94 respectively.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions only by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Quattro and W290.
As you can see, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Quattro because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Sigma Quattro will show extra detail due to its extra 17 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more modern Quattro is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sigma Quattro vs Sony W290 Specifications
Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Sigma | Sony |
Model | Sigma sd Quattro | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2016-02-23 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Dual TRUE III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS (Foveon X3) | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 29MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5424 x 3616 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Sigma SA | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
Number of lenses | 76 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,620k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.73x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 2 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.8 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.90 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 625 gr (1.38 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") | 98 x 57 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | BP-61 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $738 | $230 |