Clicky

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W330

Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63
Sigma sd Quattro front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330 front
Portability
96
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W330 Key Specs

Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Released February 2016
Sony W330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 128g - 96 x 57 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W330 Overview

In this article, we will be reviewing the Sigma Quattro vs Sony W330, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Sigma and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the Quattro (29MP) and W330 (14MP) and the Quattro (APS-C) and W330 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Quattro was released 6 years after the W330 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W330 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the Quattro scores against the W330 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Sony W330

 Quattro W330 
LaunchedFebruary 2016January 2010More modern by 75 months
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Screen resolution1620k230kSharper screen (+1390k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony W330 over the Sigma Quattro

 W330 Quattro 

Common features in the Sigma Quattro and Sony W330

 Quattro W330 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W330 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Sigma Quattro enjoys physical dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Sony W330 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).

Contrast the Sigma Quattro vs Sony W330 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the Quattro versus the W330.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W330 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Quattro and W330 is 63 and 96 respectively.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W330 top view buttons comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W330 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes simply by going through specs. The picture below should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Quattro and W330.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Quattro because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Sigma Quattro will show extra detail as a result of its extra 15 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The newer Quattro provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W330 sensor size comparison

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W330 Screen and ViewFinder

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Sigma Quattro as a Portrait photography camera
Sony W330 as a Portrait photography camera
81
manual focus
fantastic sensor resolution (29 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
features face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
28
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Sigma Quattro Street photography highlights
Sony W330 Street photography highlights
59
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
weather proofing
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than average in class (625 grams)
48
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sigma Quattro Sports photography factors
Sony W330 Sports photography factors
70
fantastic sensor resolution (29MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
features tracking autofocus
weather proofing
comes with phase detect autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (3.8 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
26
decent megapixels (14MP)
slow frames per second (2.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Sigma Quattro Travel photography information
Sony W330 Travel photography information
55
weather proofing
fantastic sensor resolution (29 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than average in class (625g)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
65
decent megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
really wide (26mm)
no Time Lapse recording
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f2.7)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Sigma Quattro
Landscape photography with Sony W330
72
manual focus
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
fantastic sensor resolution (29MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
weather proofing
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse mode
37
really wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.7)
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Sigma Quattro Vlogging factors
Sony W330 Vlogging factors
22
features face detection autofocus
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution ( pixels)
doesn't have external microphone jack
more heavy than average in class (625g)
26
really wide (26mm)
slow max aperture (f2.7)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
no mic jack
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sigma Quattro vs Sony W330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sigma Quattro and Sony W330
 Sigma sd QuattroSony Cyber-shot DSC-W330
General Information
Company Sigma Sony
Model type Sigma sd Quattro Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330
Type Advanced Mirrorless Ultracompact
Released 2016-02-23 2010-01-07
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Dual TRUE III -
Sensor type CMOS (Foveon X3) CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 366.6mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 29 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5424 x 3616 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens support Sigma SA fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-105mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.7-5.7
Macro focusing distance - 4cm
Available lenses 76 -
Crop factor 1.5 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,620 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.73x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 secs 2 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.8 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.50 m
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution - 640x480
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 625 grams (1.38 lb) 128 grams (0.28 lb)
Dimensions 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") 96 x 57 x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID BP-61 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch price $738 $170